-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
src: simplify MessagePort
construction code a bit
#23036
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
label
Sep 23, 2018
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/17383/ (Only edited the commit message since CI was started) |
devsnek
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2018
Using `ASSIGN_OR_RETURN_UNWRAP` would return if the created `MessagePort` object had no internal fields. That would be a bug, so switch to a checked conversion instead.
addaleax
force-pushed
the
message-port-checked
branch
from
September 23, 2018 17:59
c872f67
to
5ae4469
Compare
addaleax
added
the
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
label
Sep 23, 2018
jasnell
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2018
cjihrig
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2018
joyeecheung
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2018
Landed in d102a85 |
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2018
Using `ASSIGN_OR_RETURN_UNWRAP` would return if the created `MessagePort` object had no internal fields. That would be a bug, so switch to a checked conversion instead. PR-URL: #23036 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2018
Using `ASSIGN_OR_RETURN_UNWRAP` would return if the created `MessagePort` object had no internal fields. That would be a bug, so switch to a checked conversion instead. PR-URL: #23036 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
This was referenced Oct 10, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
worker
Issues and PRs related to Worker support.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using
ASSIGN_OR_RETURN_UNWRAP
would return if thecreated
MessagePort
object had no internal fields.That would be a bug, so switch to a checked conversion instead.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes