-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[10.x] Revert 17907: util: change inspect depth default #20089
Conversation
This reverts commit 8f15309.
This reverts commit b994b8e. This caused regressions in ecosystem code. While the change originally was semver-major and could be postponed until after Node.js 10, I think reverting it is a good choice at this point. Also, I personally do not think defaulting to a shallow inspect is a bad thing at all – quite the opposite: It makes `util.inspect()` give an overview of an object, rather than providing a full display of its contents. Changing the `depth` default to infinity fundamentally changed the role that `util.inspect()` plays, and makes output much more verbose and thus at times unusable for `console.log()`-style debugging. Fixes: #19405 Refs: #17907
This reverts commit 8f15309. PR-URL: #20089 Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
This reverts commit b994b8e. This caused regressions in ecosystem code. While the change originally was semver-major and could be postponed until after Node.js 10, I think reverting it is a good choice at this point. Also, I personally do not think defaulting to a shallow inspect is a bad thing at all – quite the opposite: It makes `util.inspect()` give an overview of an object, rather than providing a full display of its contents. Changing the `depth` default to infinity fundamentally changed the role that `util.inspect()` plays, and makes output much more verbose and thus at times unusable for `console.log()`-style debugging. Fixes: #19405 Refs: #17907 PR-URL: #20089 Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
72549aa looks like it's from master whereas this PR landed on v10.x-staging. The test builds for #19091 all appear to have a date in the directory name, e.g., https://nodejs.org/download/test/v10.0.0-test20180417fa00e9cc5b/ |
@richardlau Yes, sorry, I've tested with https://nodejs.org/download/rc/v10.0.0-rc.1/ and it is OK. |
Same as #20017 but targeted specifically to v10.x-staging
Ping @addaleax @Trott @TimothyGu @cjihrig @joyeecheung
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes