Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

crypto: declare int return type for set_field #17468

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

danbev
Copy link
Contributor

@danbev danbev commented Dec 5, 2017

This commit updates the set_field function pointer to return an int, and
also updates the lambdas with a return statement.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

src

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. crypto Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem. labels Dec 5, 2017
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Dec 5, 2017

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

The DH_set0_key() in src/node_crypto.cc is a backwards compatibility shim for the function of the same name in openssl 1.1.0, where it returns int.

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Dec 6, 2017

The DH_set0_key() in src/node_crypto.cc is a backwards compatibility shim for the function of the same name in openssl 1.1.0, where it returns int.

Ah I see that now, thanks for clarifying!

Is there a reason for not declaring the return type for the function pointer? I've added a commit with what I mean.

Copy link
Member

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with a suggestion.

@@ -5107,12 +5107,13 @@ void DiffieHellman::SetKey(const v8::FunctionCallbackInfo<v8::Value>& args,
BN_bin2bn(reinterpret_cast<unsigned char*>(Buffer::Data(args[0])),
Buffer::Length(args[0]), nullptr);
CHECK_NE(num, nullptr);
set_field(dh->dh, num);
USE(set_field(dh->dh, num));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since you're threading through the return value, you might as well CHECK_EQ(1, set_field(dh->dh, num));.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good, I'll add the check. Thanks

This commit updates the set_field function pointer to return an int, and
also updates the lambdas with a return statement.
@danbev danbev force-pushed the crypto_dh_set0_key_void branch from acbe9e6 to 0a1bfc1 Compare December 7, 2017 06:55
@danbev danbev changed the title crypto: make DH_set0_key void crypto: declare int return type for set_field Dec 7, 2017
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Dec 7, 2017

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Dec 8, 2017

Landed in abc2801

@danbev danbev closed this Dec 8, 2017
danbev added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2017
This commit updates the set_field function pointer to return an int, and
also updates the lambdas with a return statement.

PR-URL: #17468
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
@danbev danbev deleted the crypto_dh_set0_key_void branch December 8, 2017 06:22
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
This commit updates the set_field function pointer to return an int, and
also updates the lambdas with a return statement.

PR-URL: #17468
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
This commit updates the set_field function pointer to return an int, and
also updates the lambdas with a return statement.

PR-URL: #17468
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2017
@gibfahn
Copy link
Member

gibfahn commented Dec 20, 2017

Should this be backported to v8.x-staging? If yes please follow the guide and raise a backport PR, if no let me know or add the dont-land-on label.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. crypto Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants