Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update : test-http-upgrade-client to use countdown #17339

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

update : test-http-upgrade-client to use countdown #17339

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mithunsasidharan
Copy link
Contributor

@mithunsasidharan mithunsasidharan commented Nov 27, 2017

Refactored the test case test-http-upgrade-client to use countdown, as per issue #17169

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Nov 27, 2017
@mscdex mscdex added the http Issues or PRs related to the http subsystem. label Nov 27, 2017
@@ -60,7 +61,8 @@ srv.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', common.mustCall(function() {
['Origin', 'http://www.websocket.org']
]
];
let left = headers.length;
const countdown = new Countdown(10, () => srv.close());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why 10 ? It should be headers.length.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@daxlab : My bad.. thanks much for the correction. I've updated the PR. Kindly review!

@mithunsasidharan mithunsasidharan changed the title Updated test-http-upgrade-client to use countdown update : test-http-upgrade-client to use countdown Nov 27, 2017
@maclover7
Copy link
Contributor

@mithunsasidharan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@apapirovski : Can you please run the CI for this too ?

@apapirovski
Copy link
Member

Same here, CI is green too. Should be ready to land when someone gets a moment.

@maclover7
Copy link
Contributor

Landing...

@maclover7 maclover7 self-assigned this Dec 3, 2017
@maclover7
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution, landed in eb19c6b.
❤️ 💚 💙 💛 💜

@maclover7 maclover7 closed this Dec 3, 2017
@mithunsasidharan mithunsasidharan deleted the pr_2 branch December 3, 2017 19:27
maclover7 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2017
PR-URL: #17339
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
PR-URL: #17339
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
PR-URL: #17339
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2017
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
PR-URL: #17339
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
PR-URL: #17339
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
PR-URL: #17339
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
http Issues or PRs related to the http subsystem. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants