Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: update maintainting V8 guide #17260

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

targos
Copy link
Member

@targos targos commented Nov 22, 2017

  • Mention the now existing Node.js canary branch.
  • Clearer steps for backporting commits.
  • Mention that update-v8 can be used to simplify backports and
    updates.
  • Remove section about proposal for floating patches: embedder string
    has been implemented.

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Nov 22, 2017
* On Node.js < 9.0.0: Increase the patch level version in `v8-version.h`. This will not cause any problems with versioning because V8 will not publish other patches for this branch, so Node.js can effectively bump the patch version.
* On Node.js >= 9.0.0: Increase the `v8_embedder_string` number in `common.gypi`.
* In some cases the patch may require extra effort to merge in case V8 has changed substantially. For important issues we may be able to lean on the V8 team to get help with reimplementing the patch.
* Open a cherry-pick PR on nodejs/node targeting the *vY.x-staging* branch and notify the @nodejs/v8 team.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should have backticks around nodejs/node, to follow the rest of the doc.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@@ -289,17 +294,13 @@ To audit for floating patches:
git log --oneline deps/v8
```

To replace the copy of V8 in Node.js, use the `[update-v8](https://gist.github.com/targos/8da405e96e98fdff01a395bed365b816)` script<sup>2</sup>. For example, if you want to replace the copy of V8 in Node.js with the branch-head for V8 5.1 branch:
To replace the copy of V8 in Node.js, use the [`update-v8`](https://github.com/targos/update-v8) tool. For example, if you want to replace the copy of V8 in Node.js with the branch-head for V8 5.1 branch:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Split to 80 char line lengths while you're here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done. while I was there, I split the entire document to 80 char line lengths and put the links at the bottom.

@mscdex mscdex added the v8 engine Issues and PRs related to the V8 dependency. label Nov 23, 2017
Copy link
Member

@joyeecheung joyeecheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing this!

team to get help with reimplementing the patch.
* Open a cherry-pick PR on `nodejs/node` targeting the *vY.x-staging* branch
and notify the `@nodejs/v8` team.
* Run the Node.js [V8 CI] in addition to the [Node.js CI].
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you mention the test-v8 target in the Makefile (and possibly make-v8.sh)? It takes quite long to actually run locally but mentioning it here at least leaves a pointer about how to update the CI.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can. Do you have a suggestion for the wording?

Copy link
Member

@joyeecheung joyeecheung Nov 23, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe Note: The CI uses the `test-v8` target in the `Makefile`, which uses `tools/make-v8.sh` to reconstruct a git tree in the `deps/v8` directory to run V8 tests.

- Mention the now existing Node.js canary branch.
- Clearer steps for backporting commits.
- Mention that `update-v8` can be used to simplify backports and
updates.
- Remove section about proposal for floating patches: embedder string
has been implemented.
- Wrap lines at 80 characters.
@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Nov 23, 2017

targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2017
- Mention the now existing Node.js canary branch.
- Clearer steps for backporting commits.
- Mention that `update-v8` can be used to simplify backports and
updates.
- Remove section about proposal for floating patches: embedder string
has been implemented.
- Wrap lines at 80 characters.

PR-URL: #17260
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Nov 26, 2017

Landed in 1b9915f

@targos targos closed this Nov 26, 2017
@targos targos deleted the maintain-v8 branch November 26, 2017 09:43
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
- Mention the now existing Node.js canary branch.
- Clearer steps for backporting commits.
- Mention that `update-v8` can be used to simplify backports and
updates.
- Remove section about proposal for floating patches: embedder string
has been implemented.
- Wrap lines at 80 characters.

PR-URL: #17260
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
- Mention the now existing Node.js canary branch.
- Clearer steps for backporting commits.
- Mention that `update-v8` can be used to simplify backports and
updates.
- Remove section about proposal for floating patches: embedder string
has been implemented.
- Wrap lines at 80 characters.

PR-URL: #17260
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2017
@gibfahn
Copy link
Member

gibfahn commented Dec 19, 2017

Don't think this is worth backporting, but if anyone disagrees feel free to raise backports for v6.x and v8.x.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. v8 engine Issues and PRs related to the V8 dependency.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants