Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: make REPL test pass in coverage mode #17082

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

addaleax
Copy link
Member

Make a REPL tab completion test pass in coverage mode by using
Uin as the common prefix of all Uint*Array globals instead
of co which could be a prefix for console and coverage,
so it doesn't expand the way it's expected to in coverage mode.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes (presumably)
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test/repl

Make a REPL tab completion test pass in coverage mode by using
`Uin` as the common prefix of all `Uint*Array` globals instead
of `co` which could be a prefix for `console` and `coverage`,
so it doesn't expand the way it's expected to in coverage mode.
@addaleax addaleax added repl Issues and PRs related to the REPL subsystem. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Nov 16, 2017
@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

Landed in 6156729

@addaleax addaleax closed this Nov 16, 2017
@addaleax addaleax deleted the repl-coverage branch November 16, 2017 21:54
addaleax added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2017
Make a REPL tab completion test pass in coverage mode by using
`Uin` as the common prefix of all `Uint*Array` globals instead
of `co` which could be a prefix for `console` and `coverage`,
so it doesn't expand the way it's expected to in coverage mode.

PR-URL: #17082
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2017
Make a REPL tab completion test pass in coverage mode by using
`Uin` as the common prefix of all `Uint*Array` globals instead
of `co` which could be a prefix for `console` and `coverage`,
so it doesn't expand the way it's expected to in coverage mode.

PR-URL: #17082
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2017
Make a REPL tab completion test pass in coverage mode by using
`Uin` as the common prefix of all `Uint*Array` globals instead
of `co` which could be a prefix for `console` and `coverage`,
so it doesn't expand the way it's expected to in coverage mode.

PR-URL: #17082
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2017
Make a REPL tab completion test pass in coverage mode by using
`Uin` as the common prefix of all `Uint*Array` globals instead
of `co` which could be a prefix for `console` and `coverage`,
so it doesn't expand the way it's expected to in coverage mode.

PR-URL: #17082
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
Make a REPL tab completion test pass in coverage mode by using
`Uin` as the common prefix of all `Uint*Array` globals instead
of `co` which could be a prefix for `console` and `coverage`,
so it doesn't expand the way it's expected to in coverage mode.

PR-URL: #17082
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
repl Issues and PRs related to the REPL subsystem. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants