-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fatal error in V8 GC #9465
Labels
async_hooks
Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem.
duplicate
Issues and PRs that are duplicates of other issues or PRs.
Comments
addaleax
added
async_hooks
Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem.
duplicate
Issues and PRs that are duplicates of other issues or PRs.
labels
Nov 4, 2016
I am pretty sure this is a duplicate of #8216, so I’d recommend going over there to watch the progress. Thanks for reporting it, though! I’m closing this issue as a dupe, but if you have any follow-up questions, feel free to ask here or over there. |
3 tasks
trevnorris
added a commit
to trevnorris/node
that referenced
this issue
Dec 1, 2016
Calling JS during GC is a no-no. So intead create a queue of all ids that need to have their destroy() callback called and call them later. Removed checking destroy() in test-async-wrap-uid because destroy() can be called after the 'exit' callback. Missing a reliable test to reproduce the issue that caused the FATAL_ERROR. PR-URL: nodejs#9753 Fixes: nodejs#8216 Fixes: nodejs#9465 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
trevnorris
added a commit
to trevnorris/node
that referenced
this issue
Dec 2, 2016
Calling JS during GC is a no-no. So intead create a queue of all ids that need to have their destroy() callback called and call them later. Removed checking destroy() in test-async-wrap-uid because destroy() can be called after the 'exit' callback. Missing a reliable test to reproduce the issue that caused the FATAL_ERROR. Fixes: nodejs#8216 Fixes: nodejs#9465 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 2, 2016
Calling JS during GC is a no-no. So intead create a queue of all ids that need to have their destroy() callback called and call them later. Removed checking destroy() in test-async-wrap-uid because destroy() can be called after the 'exit' callback. Missing a reliable test to reproduce the issue that caused the FATAL_ERROR. PR-URL: #9753 Fixes: #8216 Fixes: #9465 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
trevnorris
added a commit
to trevnorris/node
that referenced
this issue
Dec 2, 2016
Calling JS during GC is a no-no. So intead create a queue of all ids that need to have their destroy() callback called and call them later. Removed checking destroy() in test-async-wrap-uid because destroy() can be called after the 'exit' callback. Missing a reliable test to reproduce the issue that caused the FATAL_ERROR. Fixes: nodejs#8216 Fixes: nodejs#9465 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
trevnorris
added a commit
to trevnorris/node
that referenced
this issue
Dec 2, 2016
Calling JS during GC is a no-no. So intead create a queue of all ids that need to have their destroy() callback called and call them later. Removed checking destroy() in test-async-wrap-uid because destroy() can be called after the 'exit' callback. Missing a reliable test to reproduce the issue that caused the FATAL_ERROR. Fixes: nodejs#8216 Fixes: nodejs#9465 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 6, 2016
Calling JS during GC is a no-no. So intead create a queue of all ids that need to have their destroy() callback called and call them later. Removed checking destroy() in test-async-wrap-uid because destroy() can be called after the 'exit' callback. Missing a reliable test to reproduce the issue that caused the FATAL_ERROR. Fixes: #8216 Fixes: #9465 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 6, 2016
Calling JS during GC is a no-no. So intead create a queue of all ids that need to have their destroy() callback called and call them later. Removed checking destroy() in test-async-wrap-uid because destroy() can be called after the 'exit' callback. Missing a reliable test to reproduce the issue that caused the FATAL_ERROR. PR-URL: #10096 Fixes: #8216 Fixes: #9465 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
jmdarling
pushed a commit
to jmdarling/node
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2016
Calling JS during GC is a no-no. So intead create a queue of all ids that need to have their destroy() callback called and call them later. Removed checking destroy() in test-async-wrap-uid because destroy() can be called after the 'exit' callback. Missing a reliable test to reproduce the issue that caused the FATAL_ERROR. PR-URL: nodejs#9753 Fixes: nodejs#8216 Fixes: nodejs#9465 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 13, 2016
Calling JS during GC is a no-no. So intead create a queue of all ids that need to have their destroy() callback called and call them later. Removed checking destroy() in test-async-wrap-uid because destroy() can be called after the 'exit' callback. Missing a reliable test to reproduce the issue that caused the FATAL_ERROR. Fixes: #8216 Fixes: #9465 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 21, 2016
Calling JS during GC is a no-no. So intead create a queue of all ids that need to have their destroy() callback called and call them later. Removed checking destroy() in test-async-wrap-uid because destroy() can be called after the 'exit' callback. Missing a reliable test to reproduce the issue that caused the FATAL_ERROR. Fixes: #8216 Fixes: #9465 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
async_hooks
Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem.
duplicate
Issues and PRs that are duplicates of other issues or PRs.
I upgraded to Node 7, cleaned node_modules and did npm install (3.10.8). Started a test run (around 4k tests) and it failed with the following a short way into the testsuite:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: