src: concentrate callbacks provided to core N-API #786
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This change reduces the places where we declare private functions with
the `napi_callback` signature for the purpose of using them with C++
callbacks passed as template arguments. We basically have 4 types:
1. static with `void` return
2. static with `napi_value` return
3. instance with `void` return
4. instance with `napi_value` return
We can use one of these four calling patterns in the following places
where we accept callbacks as template arguments:
* `Napi::Function` (1. and 2.)
* `Napi::PropertyDescriptor` (1. for the setter, 2. for the getter)
* `Napi::InstanceWrap<T>` (3., 4. for instance methods, 4. for
instance getters)
* `Napi::ObjectWrap<T>` (1., 2. for static methods, 2. for static
getters)
In the case of `InstanceWrap<T>` and `ObjectWrap<T>` instance resp.
static property descriptors we can also remove the infrastructure
designed to allow for optional getters (`GetterTag` resp.
`StaticGetterTag`) because the API for specifying instance resp. class
property descriptors does not allow one to omit the getter.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]>
gabrielschulhof
requested review from
legendecas,
addaleax,
KevinEady and
mhdawson
addaleax
approved these changes
Aug 6, 2020
|
CI:
|
|
I saw the AIX problem a few minutes ago while running node-addon-api tests for a different PR. I've pinged @richardlau and @AshCripps to look at getting that back on-line |
gabrielschulhof
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2020
This change reduces the places where we declare private functions with
the `napi_callback` signature for the purpose of using them with C++
callbacks passed as template arguments. We basically have 4 types:
1. static with `void` return
2. static with `napi_value` return
3. instance with `void` return
4. instance with `napi_value` return
We can use one of these four calling patterns in the following places
where we accept callbacks as template arguments:
* `Napi::Function` (1. and 2.)
* `Napi::PropertyDescriptor` (1. for the setter, 2. for the getter)
* `Napi::InstanceWrap<T>` (3., 4. for instance methods, 4. for
instance getters)
* `Napi::ObjectWrap<T>` (1., 2. for static methods, 2. for static
getters)
In the case of `InstanceWrap<T>` and `ObjectWrap<T>` instance resp.
static property descriptors we can also remove the infrastructure
designed to allow for optional getters (`GetterTag` resp.
`StaticGetterTag`) because the API for specifying instance resp. class
property descriptors does not allow one to omit the getter.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #786
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
|
Landed in 9aceea7. |
gabrielschulhof
restored the
simplify-objectwrap-templated-methods-new
branch
kevindavies8
added a commit
to kevindavies8/node-addon-api-Develop
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2022
This change reduces the places where we declare private functions with
the `napi_callback` signature for the purpose of using them with C++
callbacks passed as template arguments. We basically have 4 types:
1. static with `void` return
2. static with `napi_value` return
3. instance with `void` return
4. instance with `napi_value` return
We can use one of these four calling patterns in the following places
where we accept callbacks as template arguments:
* `Napi::Function` (1. and 2.)
* `Napi::PropertyDescriptor` (1. for the setter, 2. for the getter)
* `Napi::InstanceWrap<T>` (3., 4. for instance methods, 4. for
instance getters)
* `Napi::ObjectWrap<T>` (1., 2. for static methods, 2. for static
getters)
In the case of `InstanceWrap<T>` and `ObjectWrap<T>` instance resp.
static property descriptors we can also remove the infrastructure
designed to allow for optional getters (`GetterTag` resp.
`StaticGetterTag`) because the API for specifying instance resp. class
property descriptors does not allow one to omit the getter.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#786
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Marlyfleitas
added a commit
to Marlyfleitas/node-api-addon-Development
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2022
This change reduces the places where we declare private functions with
the `napi_callback` signature for the purpose of using them with C++
callbacks passed as template arguments. We basically have 4 types:
1. static with `void` return
2. static with `napi_value` return
3. instance with `void` return
4. instance with `napi_value` return
We can use one of these four calling patterns in the following places
where we accept callbacks as template arguments:
* `Napi::Function` (1. and 2.)
* `Napi::PropertyDescriptor` (1. for the setter, 2. for the getter)
* `Napi::InstanceWrap<T>` (3., 4. for instance methods, 4. for
instance getters)
* `Napi::ObjectWrap<T>` (1., 2. for static methods, 2. for static
getters)
In the case of `InstanceWrap<T>` and `ObjectWrap<T>` instance resp.
static property descriptors we can also remove the infrastructure
designed to allow for optional getters (`GetterTag` resp.
`StaticGetterTag`) because the API for specifying instance resp. class
property descriptors does not allow one to omit the getter.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#786
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
wroy7860
added a commit
to wroy7860/addon-api-benchmark-node
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2022
This change reduces the places where we declare private functions with
the `napi_callback` signature for the purpose of using them with C++
callbacks passed as template arguments. We basically have 4 types:
1. static with `void` return
2. static with `napi_value` return
3. instance with `void` return
4. instance with `napi_value` return
We can use one of these four calling patterns in the following places
where we accept callbacks as template arguments:
* `Napi::Function` (1. and 2.)
* `Napi::PropertyDescriptor` (1. for the setter, 2. for the getter)
* `Napi::InstanceWrap<T>` (3., 4. for instance methods, 4. for
instance getters)
* `Napi::ObjectWrap<T>` (1., 2. for static methods, 2. for static
getters)
In the case of `InstanceWrap<T>` and `ObjectWrap<T>` instance resp.
static property descriptors we can also remove the infrastructure
designed to allow for optional getters (`GetterTag` resp.
`StaticGetterTag`) because the API for specifying instance resp. class
property descriptors does not allow one to omit the getter.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#786
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
johnfrench3
pushed a commit
to johnfrench3/node-addon-api-git
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2023
This change reduces the places where we declare private functions with
the `napi_callback` signature for the purpose of using them with C++
callbacks passed as template arguments. We basically have 4 types:
1. static with `void` return
2. static with `napi_value` return
3. instance with `void` return
4. instance with `napi_value` return
We can use one of these four calling patterns in the following places
where we accept callbacks as template arguments:
* `Napi::Function` (1. and 2.)
* `Napi::PropertyDescriptor` (1. for the setter, 2. for the getter)
* `Napi::InstanceWrap<T>` (3., 4. for instance methods, 4. for
instance getters)
* `Napi::ObjectWrap<T>` (1., 2. for static methods, 2. for static
getters)
In the case of `InstanceWrap<T>` and `ObjectWrap<T>` instance resp.
static property descriptors we can also remove the infrastructure
designed to allow for optional getters (`GetterTag` resp.
`StaticGetterTag`) because the API for specifying instance resp. class
property descriptors does not allow one to omit the getter.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Schulhof <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs/node-addon-api#786
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change reduces the places where we declare private functions with
the
napi_callbacksignature for the purpose of using them with C++callbacks passed as template arguments. We basically have 4 types:
voidreturnnapi_valuereturnvoidreturnnapi_valuereturnWe can use one of these four calling patterns in the following places
where we accept callbacks as template arguments:
Napi::Function(1. and 2.)Napi::PropertyDescriptor(1. for the setter, 2. for the getter)Napi::InstanceWrap<T>(3., 4. for instance methods, 4. forinstance getters)
Napi::ObjectWrap<T>(1., 2. for static methods, 2. for staticgetters)
In the case of
InstanceWrap<T>andObjectWrap<T>instance resp.static property descriptors we can also remove the infrastructure
designed to allow for optional getters (
GetterTagresp.StaticGetterTag) because the API for specifying instance resp. classproperty descriptors does not allow one to omit the getter.
Signed-off-by: @gabrielschulhof