-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 578
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Status and plan for v6 LTS #153
Comments
Plan for what precisely? |
I was planning on doing a batch backport similar to what I've done for v4 On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, 9:57 AM James M Snell [email protected] wrote:
|
Upcoming releases &/or process |
If we can get automated checking/validation of backportable semver-patch PRs working reliably then that would definitely make things easier. Based on a number of conversations I've had with folks, I'm thinking that one release per month is a solid cadence. |
I'm +1 on the 1/release per month cadence. |
That doesn't mean delaying security fixes for up to a month, right? Only normal releases? |
I'm +1 on 1/month with as many as needed for security releases |
@bnoordhuis correct. |
So I'm doing my first bit of backporting of both v4 and v6 right now and finding that it surprisingly does not add that much work. Since everything needs to be audited for both line it can be done in parallel. I'm still looking to get some help and I know that @gibfahn is interested in getting involve, but figured it would be good to report that I don't think managing 2x the LTS releases will be anywhere close to 2x the work edit: this was definitely not the case for managing v0.10 and v0.12... but the delta there was substantially different |
Discussed in today's wg meeting. Going to open another issue to lay out released for next couple month's |
cc @nodejs/lts we should come with an interim plan for v6 at least for now.
I worked on a script for the bot a lot last week which should help here but it's not quite "production-ready" yet I'd say: nodejs/github-bot#90
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: