Ensure that CombinedProcessor reinitializes self.combined_maintenance_data #86
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…_data as appropriate
glennmatthews
requested review from
carbonarok,
chadell and
pke11y
as code owners
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #85
The root cause was that for CombinedProcessor,
self.combined_maintenance_datawas only initialized at class instantiation time, meaning that when processing a second set of data using the same processor, any keys previously set onself.combined_maintenance_datawould bleed over from one processing to the next. The solution is to reinitialize this dictionary each timeprocess()is called.