We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should test against comunity-latest
comunity-latest
Also we should probably test the latest versions of 2.1.x and 2.2.x (and maybe 2.3.x / 3.0.x?). We might do that via the mechanism described here:
neo4jrb/neo4j-rake_tasks#1
Sorry, something went wrong.
I think we were using this at one point, weren't we? I feel like I had to roll it back but I can't remember why beyond "broken."
On Thursday, September 10, 2015, Brian Underwood [email protected] wrote:
Should test against comunity-latest Also we should probably test the latest versions of 2.1.x and 2.2.x (and maybe 2.3.x / 3.0.x?). We might do that via the mechanism described here: neo4jrb/neo4j-rake_tasks#1 neo4jrb/neo4j-rake_tasks#1 — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #847 (comment).
neo4jrb/neo4j-rake_tasks#1 neo4jrb/neo4j-rake_tasks#1
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #847 (comment).
Yup, I don't recall why either. Just trying to give context in case somebody else picks it up ;)
No branches or pull requests
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: