Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Metadata descriptors #5454

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

LaurentGoderre
Copy link
Contributor

@LaurentGoderre LaurentGoderre commented Oct 25, 2024

This PR allows outputting all the descriptors in the metadata file. This is how it would look:

"containerimage.descriptors": [
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.index.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:09ebf864af696306655197662bac5fc5d249e273223bf0c02df053c5b969e723",
      "size": 1607,
      "annotations": {
        "org.opencontainers.image.created": "2024-10-28T13:41:56Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:465f515dfba9a241c3af16b4154e4161db1e8de1055b753434874158e7ae05d9",
      "size": 480,
      "platform": {
        "architecture": "amd64",
        "os": "linux"
      }
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.config.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:e75ff1d806b99c41ff0f797f6800a85546d5ebf447d69796ec1db166809a41a2",
      "size": 585
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:6769e746bda352f77bbc473606b8e55bed52a2e091d7bba0d953aba8915410ac",
      "size": 480,
      "platform": {
        "architecture": "arm64",
        "os": "linux"
      }
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.config.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:1c1104847de44646826edc258cfc23c4955f05ab2110d6aa1944ee283f993bb2",
      "size": 585
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:a8287ced569f2ab73e293791fcab87478106a5b87eda2567ada9341c675f52c2",
      "size": 838,
      "annotations": {
        "vnd.docker.reference.digest": "sha256:465f515dfba9a241c3af16b4154e4161db1e8de1055b753434874158e7ae05d9",
        "vnd.docker.reference.type": "attestation-manifest"
      },
      "platform": {
        "architecture": "unknown",
        "os": "unknown"
      }
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:c844cf966bdfe7d63e4b87f69b66238fe0e8e42539faa3240258b07f3e85d45d",
      "size": 838,
      "annotations": {
        "vnd.docker.reference.digest": "sha256:6769e746bda352f77bbc473606b8e55bed52a2e091d7bba0d953aba8915410ac",
        "vnd.docker.reference.type": "attestation-manifest"
      },
      "platform": {
        "architecture": "unknown",
        "os": "unknown"
      }
    }
]

Copy link
Member

@tonistiigi tonistiigi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Check the CI errors

exporter/containerimage/export.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@LaurentGoderre LaurentGoderre force-pushed the metadata-descriptors branch 2 times, most recently from e1a6070 to 9825a27 Compare October 29, 2024 13:48
@LaurentGoderre LaurentGoderre marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2024 16:42
@LaurentGoderre LaurentGoderre force-pushed the metadata-descriptors branch 2 times, most recently from 10da43c to 89e41a8 Compare November 4, 2024 15:31
@@ -160,6 +160,13 @@ func testBuildMetadataFile(t *testing.T, sb integration.Sandbox) {
require.NotEmpty(t, desc.MediaType)
require.NotEmpty(t, desc.Digest.String())

require.Contains(t, metadata, exptypes.ExporterImageDescriptorsKey)
var descList []*ocispecs.Descriptor
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't quite understand what is happening here. Why are we marshalling just to unmarshal the same value again.

After parsing, check that these are real descriptors, with real digest/size/mediatype and that the length matches.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, this looks to be (convoluted) way to convert interface{} backed by map to a typed struct. Usually, a better approach would be to parse into map[string]json.RawMessage.

If you add a comment for this, then you can leave the conversion as is but do add the checks to make sure that the descriptors are real and contain correct values. Ideally, I think this should also be checked for both single-arch and multi-arch results as looks that the expected output is different.

@thompson-shaun thompson-shaun modified the milestones: v0.19.0, v0.18.0 Nov 21, 2024
idx.Manifests = append(idx.Manifests, *desc)
mfstDesc.Platform = &dp
idx.Manifests = append(idx.Manifests, *mfstDesc)
descriptors = append(descriptors, mfstDesc, configDesc)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be just mfstDesc. Mixing manifest and config descriptors together does not make a predictable result. And how would one even connect the ones that are for the same image.

@thompson-shaun thompson-shaun modified the milestones: v0.18.0, v0.19.0 Nov 22, 2024
@tonistiigi
Copy link
Member

Testing

For single arch build I get:

  "containerimage.descriptor": {
    "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
    "digest": "sha256:4399329e7d074f75334ae57e17600c6b694752ddc995925bd2e8dead2e527a23",
    "size": 672,
    "annotations": {
      "org.opencontainers.image.created": "2024-11-22T22:47:59Z"
    },
    "platform": {
      "architecture": "arm64",
      "os": "linux"
    }
  },
  "containerimage.descriptors": [
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:4399329e7d074f75334ae57e17600c6b694752ddc995925bd2e8dead2e527a23",
      "size": 672,
      "annotations": {
        "org.opencontainers.image.created": "2024-11-22T22:47:59Z"
      },
      "platform": {
        "architecture": "arm64",
        "os": "linux"
      }
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.config.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:78b9c55f4bcdac3f3768bb6d9ce4947c3098140595f7e8f13b3dba927206e1bf",
      "size": 833
    }
  ],
  "containerimage.digest": "sha256:4399329e7d074f75334ae57e17600c6b694752ddc995925bd2e8dead2e527a23"

So there isn't much difference between old field and new one. Except for the config descriptor.

Multi-arch:

 "containerimage.descriptor": {
    "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.index.v1+json",
    "digest": "sha256:d633778c92d58e0210fea8f959f6e6d8e4dad8d99431abed5ee7fd5ffa23491d",
    "size": 1607,
    "annotations": {
      "org.opencontainers.image.created": "2024-11-22T22:49:09Z"
    }
  },
  "containerimage.descriptors": [
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.index.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:d633778c92d58e0210fea8f959f6e6d8e4dad8d99431abed5ee7fd5ffa23491d",
      "size": 1607,
      "annotations": {
        "org.opencontainers.image.created": "2024-11-22T22:49:09Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:d2b38a8c974cd88dae45c6f9ea13cf1b05c337c1e69a0547af8a3c463489c797",
      "size": 672,
      "platform": {
        "architecture": "amd64",
        "os": "linux"
      }
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.config.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:6fe24fa44bfb9af9e146e775f6a72503dd3f9bfe7678d9f86defa4b84c8f0d39",
      "size": 817
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:9cc1e9b2e46383939de3f05886baf69c0132136dfeb0c767a4e069659dac1fe7",
      "size": 672,
      "platform": {
        "architecture": "arm64",
        "os": "linux"
      }
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.config.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:292cad1b8f1528fea3626c83415e892fb7e399aa91aad02e9c9bd05951f4cf80",
      "size": 818
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:fd159f9b8bec20a69d5fcc5002c4de98103fb98ae6c5d4a50e13dcc77ebe4f4c",
      "size": 565,
      "annotations": {
        "vnd.docker.reference.digest": "sha256:d2b38a8c974cd88dae45c6f9ea13cf1b05c337c1e69a0547af8a3c463489c797",
        "vnd.docker.reference.type": "attestation-manifest"
      },
      "platform": {
        "architecture": "unknown",
        "os": "unknown"
      }
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:60f696f5a9027bf7596d622a3f7c6a145b97d03e3e7ef4a40f8508b250f49ca4",
      "size": 565,
      "annotations": {
        "vnd.docker.reference.digest": "sha256:9cc1e9b2e46383939de3f05886baf69c0132136dfeb0c767a4e069659dac1fe7",
        "vnd.docker.reference.type": "attestation-manifest"
      },
      "platform": {
        "architecture": "unknown",
        "os": "unknown"
      }
    }
  ],
  "containerimage.digest": "sha256:d633778c92d58e0210fea8f959f6e6d8e4dad8d99431abed5ee7fd5ffa23491d"

This one has root manifest (duplicate), single-arch manifests, configs for single-arch, attestations manifest, (but no configs for attestations). I guess my initial thought would have been that the old field contains the descriptor of the root, and new field contains the descriptors immediately under the root (without the root itself and without the configs). I don't know if that helps with the use-case you are trying to use it though, but atm. there doesn't seem to be a very clear definition of which descriptors are appended to the result and which are skipped. And as mentioned in the previous comment, it isn't very clear how these additional config descriptors should be used as it cannot be determined what manifest or platform they belong to.

@LaurentGoderre
Copy link
Contributor Author

Its usefulness is more obvious when using attestation manifest and tags. Here is the output I get for a single arch

"containerimage.descriptor": {
    "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.index.v1+json",
    "digest": "sha256:9503904dd20d71f165afb82819327f30ce1c9d0d0d8216589877c302f139c4cf",
    "size": 856,
    "annotations": {
      "org.opencontainers.image.created": "2024-11-25T14:48:37Z"
    }
  },
  "containerimage.descriptors": [
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.index.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:9503904dd20d71f165afb82819327f30ce1c9d0d0d8216589877c302f139c4cf",
      "size": 856,
      "annotations": {
        "org.opencontainers.image.created": "2024-11-25T14:48:37Z"
      }
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:ec637423e72cdd0b21aa8c80639d5810fb9c7b2c61a73c848f63353b4c8043f1",
      "size": 1052,
      "platform": {
        "architecture": "arm64",
        "os": "linux"
      }
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.config.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:10166aa54184f653461204fda1cb83acd8cbb21d2fa0f35901f8852e83c8af4a",
      "size": 6215
    },
    {
      "mediaType": "application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json",
      "digest": "sha256:2cf7dc5a44a200a07c57ddbe0f44b52ba26f8e96e57b06d735d8d6d030a01eb8",
      "size": 840,
      "annotations": {
        "vnd.docker.reference.digest": "sha256:ec637423e72cdd0b21aa8c80639d5810fb9c7b2c61a73c848f63353b4c8043f1",
        "vnd.docker.reference.type": "attestation-manifest"
      },
      "platform": {
        "architecture": "unknown",
        "os": "unknown"
      }
    }
  ],

@LaurentGoderre LaurentGoderre force-pushed the metadata-descriptors branch 2 times, most recently from 25ffd37 to ba57483 Compare November 29, 2024 17:20
@thompson-shaun thompson-shaun marked this pull request as draft December 12, 2024 18:53
@thompson-shaun thompson-shaun modified the milestones: v0.19.0, v0.20.0 Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants