Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MJML6 Migrate from Lerna to NX, and introducing Typescript #2908

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: fix/replace-html-minifier
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

iRyusa
Copy link
Member

@iRyusa iRyusa commented Oct 4, 2024

There's no ETA on this as I work on this on my free time.

I don't know if anyone will read this but given the time I have it's hard to find time to add new features into the codebase our test coverage purely sucks, releasing new version sucks, installing the project locally sucks.

So what's the plan ?

  • Migrate from outdated Lerna to Nx
  • Remove Babel.
  • Add a very loose Typescript config and start typing as much public API as possible
  • Ship d.ts file
  • Make automatic release from git tags on NPM

This would at least make MJML contribution WAY EASIER for everyone wanting to get involved in the project.

Why a v6 when v5 is not out yet ?

Ok so v5 was behind an "experimental" branch because of changing "core" elements for minifying/beautify the HTML, numbers might not be relevant, but there's 600k+ download per week of MJMl 4. If v5 was released, that would mean a lot of you would just jump in v5 finding new bug and giving my limited time I could work on MJML5 I wouldn't be able to patch it right away.
I don't feel safe releasing new version of MJML (so imagine for a major one when you replace core dep), so that's why v6 is needed to ensure we can provide safe & faster release.

New features when ?

Not planned for now, sorry for pushing 2 major versions without any groundbreaking feature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant