Improvements of Aggregate Report

[madelondohmen]

Problem

See issue #2635 for the full description of the problem

!!! Note: There are some other problems in the reports that will be fixed with issue #2588. These won't be fixed with this PR.

Changes

This PR makes the following fixes in the Aggregate Report:

• Make the font size smaller of the text "You've selected all objects in the previous step"
• "System specific" is now only visible if there's data in this section

Besides this, it also makes these improvements to both the Aggregate Report as the Generate Report:

• Sorting open ports (from low to high) + extra unit test to check this
• Sorting the report types while selecting (they're now in a random order)

Issue link

Closes #2635

Demo

Open ports sorting:

Sorting report types:

Fix font size:

---

Code Checklist

• All the commits in this PR are properly PGP-signed and verified.
• This PR only contains functionality relevant to the issue; tickets have been created for newly discovered issues.
• I have written unit tests for the changes or fixes I made.
• For any non-trivial functionality, I have added integration and/or end-to-end tests.
• I have performed a self-review of my code and refactored it to the best of my abilities.

Communication

• I have informed others of any required .env changes files if required and changed the .env-dist accordingly.
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation, if necessary.
• I have included comments in the code to elaborate on what is not self-evident from the code itself, including references to issues and discussions online, or implicit behavior of an interface.

---

Checklist for code reviewers:

Copy-paste the checklist from the docs/source/templates folder into your comment.

---

Checklist for QA:

Copy-paste the checklist from the docs/source/templates folder into your comment.

[ammar92]

Looks good to me

[stephanie0x00]

Checklist for QA:

• I have checked out this branch, and successfully ran a fresh make reset.
• I confirmed that there are no unintended functional regressions in this branch:
  • I have managed to pass the onboarding flow
  • Objects and Findings are created properly
  • Tasks are created and completed properly
• I confirmed that the PR's advertised feature or hotfix works as intended.

What works:

The changes look good. No comments.

What doesn't work:

n/a

Bug or feature?:

n/a