Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update notes.tex: fix typo #218

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 2024fall
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update notes.tex: fix typo #218

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion topic05_LearningFromData_Overfitting/notes.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ \section*{Section 4.2: Regularization}

\textit{NOTE:}
This is a common interview question, and something that you should be able to do ``without thinking''.
I happen to think it's a bad interview question in the sense that it doesn't directly measure what you'll be doing on the job (you're job isn't calculus).
I happen to think it's a bad interview question in the sense that it doesn't directly measure what you'll be doing on the job (your job isn't calculus).
That said, the ability to solve this problem correlates pretty highly with having a detailed mathematical understanding of machine learning concepts that are practical on the job,
and so ``lazy'' interviewers will ask this to get a sense of your math abilities.
\end{problem}
Expand Down