-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 829
Fix room history not being visible even if we have historical keys #8563
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ import { TimelineWindow } from "matrix-js-sdk/src/timeline-window"; | |
import { EventType, RelationType } from 'matrix-js-sdk/src/@types/event'; | ||
import { SyncState } from 'matrix-js-sdk/src/sync'; | ||
import { RoomMember, RoomMemberEvent } from 'matrix-js-sdk/src/models/room-member'; | ||
import { debounce } from 'lodash'; | ||
import { debounce, throttle } from 'lodash'; | ||
import { logger } from "matrix-js-sdk/src/logger"; | ||
import { ClientEvent } from "matrix-js-sdk/src/client"; | ||
import { Thread } from 'matrix-js-sdk/src/models/thread'; | ||
|
@@ -806,23 +806,34 @@ class TimelinePanel extends React.Component<IProps, IState> { | |
// Can be null for the notification timeline, etc. | ||
if (!this.props.timelineSet.room) return; | ||
|
||
if (ev.getRoomId() !== this.props.timelineSet.room.roomId) return; | ||
|
||
if (!this.state.events.includes(ev)) return; | ||
|
||
this.recheckFirstVisibleEventIndex(); | ||
|
||
// Need to update as we don't display event tiles for events that | ||
// haven't yet been decrypted. The event will have just been updated | ||
// in place so we just need to re-render. | ||
// TODO: We should restrict this to only events in our timeline, | ||
// but possibly the event tile itself should just update when this | ||
// happens to save us re-rendering the whole timeline. | ||
if (ev.getRoomId() === this.props.timelineSet.room.roomId) { | ||
this.buildCallEventGroupers(this.state.events); | ||
this.forceUpdate(); | ||
} | ||
this.buildCallEventGroupers(this.state.events); | ||
this.forceUpdate(); | ||
}; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is it possible to write a test for this scenario so we don't regress? This stuff seems very order dependent and tricky to get right How were you testing locally to confirm the change works? (reproduction steps) There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We can regression test the single edge we identified and fixed here, but there are so many edges, you will struggle to cover them all. Even hitting 100% coverage won't cover all the possible races & scenarios. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think it should be possible - I'll have a look into it, would you mind creating an issue? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. |
||
|
||
private onSync = (clientSyncState: SyncState, prevState: SyncState, data: object): void => { | ||
if (this.unmounted) return; | ||
this.setState({ clientSyncState }); | ||
}; | ||
|
||
private recheckFirstVisibleEventIndex = throttle((): void => { | ||
const firstVisibleEventIndex = this.checkForPreJoinUISI(this.state.events); | ||
if (firstVisibleEventIndex !== this.state.firstVisibleEventIndex) { | ||
this.setState({ firstVisibleEventIndex }); | ||
} | ||
}, 500, { leading: true, trailing: true }); | ||
|
||
private readMarkerTimeout(readMarkerPosition: number): number { | ||
return readMarkerPosition === 0 ? | ||
this.context?.readMarkerInViewThresholdMs ?? this.state.readMarkerInViewThresholdMs : | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm curious how this fixes element-hq/element-web#16983
What stopped it from working before?
What changes were made to make history visible now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We weren't re-checking
checkForPreJoinUISI
when we decrypted events, there's a comment incheckForPreJoinUISI
which says it treats on-going decryptions the same as failed decryptions. This created a race condition between rendering and decryption. So if you receive keys after the initial render, its almost guaranteed to go down the unhappy path.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This specific bit doesn't do it; the
recheck
method does the trick - now when an event is decrypted we check if we can show older events, we didn't do that beforeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Beat me to it (again today :D)