core, params: add max code init size check in txpool

[manav2401]

Description

This PR adds a check in transaction pool to discard transactions which has size more than the max code init size. Reference of geth's PR: ethereum/go-ethereum#26504.

Important Note:
This is a partial fix to an EIP which has already been implemented fully in geth (and other ethereum clients) but requires hard fork as it modifies the validation rules in state transition. Hence, at the moment we're only adding a check in transaction pool to reduce the possibility of attack. The plan is to co-ordinate and have these changes in the next hardfork either by manually doing the changes referencing the original PR or by pulling upstream geth changes.

Changes

• Bugfix (non-breaking change that solves an issue)
• Hotfix (change that solves an urgent issue, and requires immediate attention)
• New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• Breaking change (change that is not backwards-compatible and/or changes current functionality)
• Changes only for a subset of nodes

Breaking changes

Please complete this section if any breaking changes have been made, otherwise delete it

Nodes audience

In case this PR includes changes that must be applied only to a subset of nodes, please specify how you handled it (e.g. by adding a flag with a default value...)

Checklist

• I have added at least 2 reviewer or the whole pos-v1 team
• I have added sufficient documentation in code
• I will be resolving comments - if any - by pushing each fix in a separate commit and linking the commit hash in the comment reply

Cross repository changes

• This PR requires changes to heimdall
  • In case link the PR here:
• This PR requires changes to matic-cli
  • In case link the PR here:

Testing

• I have added unit tests
• I have added tests to CI
• I have tested this code manually on local environment
• I have tested this code manually on remote devnet using express-cli
• I have tested this code manually on mumbai
• I have created new e2e tests into express-cli

Manual tests

Please complete this section with the steps you performed if you ran manual tests for this functionality, otherwise delete it

Additional comments

Please post additional comments in this section if you have them, otherwise delete it

[temaniarpit27]

i hope so that this check wont break any existing functionality.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 56.66% // Head: 56.68% // Increases project coverage by +0.02% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (599c678) compared to base (d9cc218).
Patch coverage: 0.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##               qa     #739      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.66%   56.68%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         610      610              
  Lines       70628    70630       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        40023    40039      +16     
+ Misses      27180    27163      -17     
- Partials     3425     3428       +3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
core/tx_pool.go	71.02% <0.00%> (+0.34%)	⬆️
params/protocol_params.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
eth/peerset.go	72.34% <0.00%> (-8.52%)	⬇️
les/distributor.go	79.68% <0.00%> (-2.35%)	⬇️
p2p/simulations/mocker.go	30.00% <0.00%> (-2.23%)	⬇️
les/odr.go	89.02% <0.00%> (-1.22%)	⬇️
rpc/handler.go	89.52% <0.00%> (-1.05%)	⬇️
miner/worker.go	72.62% <0.00%> (-0.95%)	⬇️
p2p/simulations/http.go	66.02% <0.00%> (-0.65%)	⬇️
les/downloader/downloader.go	74.94% <0.00%> (-0.32%)	⬇️
... and 12 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.