-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
move processing to output function #1227
Merged
+18
−64
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
<p><a href="%3Ctest">URL</a></p> |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
[URL](<test) |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't test for pedantic much, and I don't see it well documented anywhere. The only docs I could find are in the man page.
Can you explain when I should test for pedantic in the future?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand this code right, without
pedantic
we will sethref
but nottitle
. If my understanding is correct, why is this behavior desirable?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
pedantic
flag means follow the original 2004 spec from John Gruber (Daring Fireball).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The regexes are grouped based on the options. The link regex that you fixed was in the pedantic group
The title is set in the else clause. The regex for a non-pedantic link is
/^!?\[(label)\]\(href(?:\s+(title))?\s*\)/
which is extremely complex when constructed and probably also error prone.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
here is the actual non-pedantic link regex:
/^!?\[((?:\[[^\[\]]*\]|\\[\[\]]?|`[^`]*`|[^\[\]\\])*?)\]\(\s*(<(?:\\[<>]?|[^\s<>\\])*>|(?:\\[()]?|\([^\s\x00-\x1f()\\]*\)|[^\s\x00-\x1f()\\])*?)(?:\s+("(?:\\"?|[^"\\])*"|'(?:\\'?|[^'\\])*'|\((?:\\\)?|[^)\\])*\)))?\s*\)/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The link regex is checking for a title. If no title is found then the href is already set to the whole string inside the parentheses and there is no title.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The regex that you used before when there was no title (
/^(<?[\s\S]*>?)/
) literally matches any string and sincehref
is already set to the whole string there is no need to change it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Further down we then set the
title
field in the returned object based on the (undefined?) value of title. Do we want to set a default value fortitle
, e.g.''
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My two cents would be an empty value of expected type. Avoid null and undefined checks and possibilities.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see what you are saying. Yes title should probably be defined as
null
or''
looks like commonmark doesn't differentiate between the title being an empty string or no title: demo
so I will set it to an empty string.