Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exempt borrowing implementation #118782

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 14, 2023

Conversation

MikeSpreitzer
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR is intended to implement a recent enhancement to https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-api-machinery/1040-priority-and-fairness#dispatching , borrowing by the exempt priority level.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

@tkashem started the work on this, in #117703 . He has gone on vacation and I am picking up the work.
This PR is not complete yet. It still needs to (a) change the config-consuming controller to connect the new configuration possibility with the corresponding new behavior in QueueSet and (b) finish adjusting the config-producing controller.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

In the API Priority and Fairness feature, priority levels that are exempt from limitation can now be given a nominal and a lendable concurrency and their dispatching borrows from the concurrency limits of the other priority levels.  For details see https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-api-machinery/1040-priority-and-fairness#dispatching .

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

- [KEP] https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-api-machinery/1040-priority-and-fairness

/cc @wojtek-t
/cc @deads2k
@tkashem
@lavalamp

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from deads2k June 21, 2023 03:51
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Jun 21, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from wojtek-t June 21, 2023 03:51
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. area/apiserver area/code-generation kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 21, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

This PR may require API review.

If so, when the changes are ready, complete the pre-review checklist and request an API review.

Status of requested reviews is tracked in the API Review project.

@jiahuif
Copy link
Member

jiahuif commented Jun 22, 2023

/assign @wojtek-t
Could you take a look at this? Thank you.
/api-review
/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 22, 2023
@MikeSpreitzer MikeSpreitzer force-pushed the exempt-borrowing-impl branch from d883c7d to 45156e1 Compare June 23, 2023 20:26
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 23, 2023
@MikeSpreitzer
Copy link
Member Author

The force-push to 45156e107fd is a rebase onto master.

@MikeSpreitzer MikeSpreitzer force-pushed the exempt-borrowing-impl branch from 45156e1 to 77afe54 Compare June 24, 2023 05:21
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 24, 2023
@MikeSpreitzer MikeSpreitzer force-pushed the exempt-borrowing-impl branch from 77afe54 to 4da07df Compare June 25, 2023 21:37
@MikeSpreitzer
Copy link
Member Author

/test gce-master-scale-performance

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MikeSpreitzer: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cadvisor-e2e-kubernetes
  • /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel
  • /test pull-kubernetes-coverage-unit
  • /test pull-kubernetes-dependencies
  • /test pull-kubernetes-dependencies-go-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-100-performance
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-big-performance
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-no-stage
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-network-proxy-http-connect
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-scale-performance-manual
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipv6
  • /test pull-kubernetes-integration
  • /test pull-kubernetes-integration-go-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-scale
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd
  • /test pull-kubernetes-typecheck
  • /test pull-kubernetes-unit
  • /test pull-kubernetes-unit-go-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-update
  • /test pull-kubernetes-verify
  • /test pull-kubernetes-verify-go-canary

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test check-dependency-stats
  • /test pull-ci-kubernetes-unit-windows
  • /test pull-e2e-gce-cloud-provider-disabled
  • /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-image-test
  • /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only
  • /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ipv6-parallel
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cos-cgroupv1-containerd-node-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cos-cgroupv1-containerd-node-e2e-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cos-cgroupv2-containerd-node-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cos-cgroupv2-containerd-node-e2e-eviction
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cos-cgroupv2-containerd-node-e2e-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cos-cgroupv2-containerd-node-e2e-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cross
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-autoscaling-hpa-cm
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-autoscaling-hpa-cpu
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-azure-disk
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-azure-disk-vmss
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-azure-file
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-azure-file-vmss
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-conformance
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-windows
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-windows-alpha-feature-vertical-pod-autoscaler
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-windows-alpha-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-windows-serial-slow-hpa
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-containerd-gce
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-correctness
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-alpha-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-csi-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-device-plugin-gpu
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-kubelet-credential-provider
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-network-proxy-grpc
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-disruptive
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-slow
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-snapshot
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-autoscaling
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ipvs
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-inplace-pod-resize-containerd-main-v2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-alpha-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-dual-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipv6-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipvs-dual-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-kms
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-multizone
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-storage-kind-disruptive
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-ubuntu-gce-network-policies
  • /test pull-kubernetes-kind-dra
  • /test pull-kubernetes-kind-json-logging
  • /test pull-kubernetes-kind-text-logging
  • /test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-big
  • /test pull-kubernetes-local-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-arm64-e2e-containerd-ec2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-arm64-e2e-containerd-serial-ec2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-arm64-ubuntu-serial-gce
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-cgrpv1-evented-pleg-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-cgrpv2-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-cgrpv2-e2e-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-e2e-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-alpha-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-ec2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-features-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-sidecar-containers
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-standalone-mode
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-standalone-mode-all-alpha
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-crio-dra
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-credential-provider
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-containerd
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-containerd-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-cpu-manager
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-cpu-manager-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-crio-cgroupv1
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-crio-cgroupv2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-hugepages
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-memory-manager
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-pod-disruption-conditions
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-topology-manager
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-topology-manager-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-memoryqos-cgrpv2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-swap-fedora
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-swap-fedora-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-swap-ubuntu-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-unit-experimental
  • /test pull-kubernetes-verify-strict-lint
  • /test pull-publishing-bot-validate

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel
  • pull-kubernetes-dependencies
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipv6
  • pull-kubernetes-integration
  • pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd
  • pull-kubernetes-typecheck
  • pull-kubernetes-unit
  • pull-kubernetes-verify

In response to this:

/test gce-master-scale-performance

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@MikeSpreitzer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-big-performance

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 13, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from deads2k July 13, 2023 21:52
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 13, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, MikeSpreitzer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 13, 2023
@MikeSpreitzer
Copy link
Member Author

MikeSpreitzer commented Jul 13, 2023

/hold
will try to rebase at a later hour

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 13, 2023
@MikeSpreitzer MikeSpreitzer force-pushed the exempt-borrowing-impl branch from f410f52 to ce90eb2 Compare July 14, 2023 01:03
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 14, 2023
@MikeSpreitzer
Copy link
Member Author

MikeSpreitzer commented Jul 14, 2023

/unhold
The force-push to ce90eb2 is a rebase onto master, after #119305 merged.
Local testing shows that it resolved the round-trip checking failures.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 14, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Jul 14, 2023

@MikeSpreitzer: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-scale-performance-manual 221baa23c1fea5b754924a72a4913f58eb81804d link true /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-scale-performance-manual

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@MikeSpreitzer
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Jul 14, 2023

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 14, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 28d44bdbcf517cee9a7ded21221ba8135bb020ee

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api-review Categorizes an issue or PR as actively needing an API review. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/apiserver area/code-generation cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants