-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 202
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add manual build and deploy to help learning experience #117
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
btw maybe there could be a refenrece to the official doc to indicate this step by step deploy approach. |
I like this... I've found that customizing jupyterlite for embedding in Quepid has been daunting at times... A lot of concepts to engage with! |
I think that was the intent of this guide: https://jupyterlite.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart/standalone.html Otherwise maybe there could be a new guide under this section called "Deploy to GitHub Pages manually": https://jupyterlite.readthedocs.io/en/latest/howto/index.html#deploying Note there is also this tutorial I was hoping to contribute some parts of it to the main docs: https://pyconde2023-jupyterlite.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorial.html |
REM make sure git is clear: | ||
REM git status --porcelain | ||
|
||
git push origin --delete gh-pages |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The gh-pages
approach has the drawback of increasing the repo size quite significantly.
Also the GitHub Action to deploy to GitHub Pages will likely be default way soon.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So not sure about recommending using gh-pages
(even though it's been there for years)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is not "Github Pages" and "gh-pages" the same thing ?
Any deployment must necessarily provide the static site somewhere, right ?
And the latest stage is enough - no need for history.
If so, this is what the deploy script does.
Now deploying on github is not a reco in my mind, just a fast way to test, available to anybody.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even faster is local deploy - added in the section - this brings attention to the dist
repo.
I agree this step by step "local first" guide may be available in several places and shapes. I have no strong opinion about it. In my mind this PR is not necessarily meant to be merged, rather to show how a user - like me, but I cannot be that special - would go about trying jupyterlite beyond the initial demo effect provided by the full automatic process. There is nothing like running commands in terminal, watching the effects, adjust, all the way to deployment. This is all the more true for a static site which can easily be tweaked before deploy. If you prefer taking pieces of it, or just the genral idea to write it differently, this is 100% fine with me. (But writing it as a PR enabled me to test it) |
As a user, I would rather not jump directly to full automation - with GA.
Instead, I am much more interested to go step by step, and only when full understood, use magical automation.
Somebody who wants to create a custom jupytelite may start from there and iterate/change the repo to fine tune their specifics.
Then the deploy script is so fast that in many cases it is a good option to just run it - like you would run say a "git push --tags".
Hope this helps.