Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use rapidfuzz instead of fuzzywuzzy #1319

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 10, 2020
Merged

use rapidfuzz instead of fuzzywuzzy #1319

merged 1 commit into from May 10, 2020

Conversation

maxbachmann
Copy link
Contributor

FuzzyWuzzy is GPLv2 licensed which would force you to licence the whole project under GPLv2. I had the same problem on one of my projects and so I wrote rapidfuzz which is implementing the same algorithm but is based on a version of fuzzywuzzy that was MIT Licensed and is therefor MIT Licensed aswell, so it can be used in here without forcing a License change. As a nice bonus it is fully implemented in C++ and comes with a few Algorithmic improvements making it between 5 and 100 times faster than FuzzyWuzzy. (actually even faster since python-Levenshtein was not used)

Copy link
Member

@willingc willingc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems like a reasonable change to me. Thanks for the PR.

@willingc
Copy link
Member

I'm going to merge. If anyone experiences any regressions from the change, please file an issue. Thanks.

@willingc willingc merged commit 95ec89a into jupyter:master May 10, 2020
aalmanza1998 added a commit to LibreTexts/ngshare_exchange that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2020
@BertR BertR added this to the 0.6.2 milestone Mar 16, 2021
BertR added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2021
FuzzyWuzzy is GPLv2 licensed which would force you to licence the whole project under GPLv2. I had the same problem on one of my projects and so I wrote [rapidfuzz](https://github.com/rhasspy/rapidfuzz) which is implementing the same algorithm but is based on a version of fuzzywuzzy that was MIT Licensed and is therefor MIT Licensed aswell, so it can be used in here without forcing a License change. As a nice bonus it is fully implemented in C++ and comes with a few Algorithmic improvements making it between 5 and 100 times faster than FuzzyWuzzy. (actually even faster since python-Levenshtein was not used)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants