Docs for for…from
#4368
Merged
Docs for for…from
#4368
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GeoffreyBooth
force-pushed
the
for-from-docs
branch
from
587363a to
57f9cda
Compare
Merged
…avaScript that runs in every JavaScript runtime 😢
GeoffreyBooth
force-pushed
the
for-from-docs
branch
from
57f9cda to
2dc3571
Compare
lydell
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Documentation for #4355. This adds documentation for the new
for…fromsyntax. I put it in the Bound and Generator Functions section, with a link from the Loops section. I’m open to persuasion that it should go the other way around.I also added a note that the CoffeeScript compiler does not, in fact, output JavaScript that can run in every JavaScript runtime. It’s a sad day, I know. But really we should’ve added this note when we added support for generators, and certainly for modules.