Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Nested Url support. #75

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MisterPoppet
Copy link

I like to be able to organize certain projects into smaller modules (similar to how Django does it). This will let others do it as well. It's done by simply making the kallable of a tuple be another list of tuples.

@j2labs
Copy link
Owner

j2labs commented May 30, 2012

This is a neat idea. Would you mind sharing a sample of what your projects then look like?

@MisterPoppet
Copy link
Author

Absolutely. I'm writing some productivity software (read: project management plus more), and want the user to be able to simply add, replace or remove whole chunks of functionality. I've set up a little demo repo to illustrate what how I intend on organizing it. I still need to look into handling hooks, and how Jinja2 deals with template directories (as I want to have template overrides).

Here's the code: https://github.com/MisterPoppet/demo_nested_urls

@j2labs
Copy link
Owner

j2labs commented May 31, 2012

This is awesome!

I will merge this in the next day or two.

On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Bryan Redeagle wrote:

Absolutely. I'm writing some productivity software (read: project management plus more), and want the user to be able to simply add, replace or remove whole chunks of functionality. I've set up a little demo repo to illustrate what how I intend on organizing it. I still need to look into handling hooks, and how Jinja2 deals with template directories (as I want to have template overrides).

Here's the code: https://github.com/MisterPoppet/demo_nested_urls


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#75 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants