This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 27, 2023. It is now read-only.
feat: LsBatchSync to fetch single batch of results #6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This adds function that returns a single batch and an int with total count. This enables consumer of this lib to implement manual pagination or get total pin count in efficient manner.
|
Oops 😬. Thought we did a diff with origin beforehand, but I guess I'll just use lease now to be sure. Two releases already, we're on a roll 😛 |
this cleans up errors
aschmahmann
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2020
Jorropo
pushed a commit
to ipfs/go-libipfs-rapide
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2023
…at/ls-with-limit feat: LsBatchSync to fetch single batch of results This commit was moved from ipfs/go-pinning-service-http-client@9087f9a
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the same as #4, which did not end up in
master, so PRing rebased version again.(@aschmahmann we lost those changes due to
--forceinstead ofgit push --force-with-lease:))