Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixer mixer #122

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fixer mixer #122

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

crStiv
Copy link

@crStiv crStiv commented Nov 23, 2024

Minor Mistakes Fix

This pull request fixes minor typos in three files within the project to improve clarity and professionalism:

  1. .github/workflows/build-darwin-amd64.yml:

    • Corrected the typo in the job name from Build and Package for Darwin ADM642 to Build and Package for Darwin AMD64.
  2. api/minievm/evm/v1/query.pulsar.go:

    • Fixed the typo in a comment from wtether to whether.
  3. api/minievm/evm/v1/query_grpc.pb.go:

    • Corrected the typo in a comment from return the function result to return the function result.

These minor adjustments enhance the quality of the project's documentation and workflows.


Author Checklist

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title.
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change.
  • targeted the correct branch.
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification (if applicable).
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary.
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests (N/A for typo fixes).
  • updated relevant documentation or specifications, including comments.
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed.

Reviewers Checklist

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title.
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed.
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage (N/A for typo fixes).

Allow edits by maintainers.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced EVM query handling with new message types for improved data management.
    • Introduced fields for Sender, ContractAddr, Input, Value, and TraceOptions in request structures.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected documentation for the WithStorage field in the TraceOptions structure.
  • Improvements

    • Standardized logic for handling fields across various request and response types for consistency.

fixed "ADM642" to "AMD64"
fixed "wtether" to "whether"
useless space gap
@crStiv crStiv requested a review from a team as a code owner November 23, 2024 22:16
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to two main files: a GitHub Actions workflow for building Darwin AMD64 and a Go file handling EVM queries. The workflow file corrects a typographical error in the job name and introduces a new environment variable, ARCH_NAME. The Go file sees structural modifications, including the addition of new message types and refinement of existing request and response structures, enhancing clarity and functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/build-darwin-amd64.yml - Job name updated from Build and Package for Darwin ADM642 to Build and Package for Darwin AMD64.
- New environment variable ARCH_NAME added, set to "x86_64".
api/minievm/evm/v1/query.pulsar.go - Updated TraceOptions struct comment for WithStorage field for clarity.
- Enhanced QueryCallRequest struct with new fields: Sender, ContractAddr, Input, Value, and TraceOptions.
- Enhanced QueryCallResponse struct with new fields: Response, UsedGas, Logs, TraceOutput, and Error.
- Defined QueryParamsRequest and QueryParamsResponse structures.
- Introduced new message types: QueryContractAddrByDenomRequest, QueryContractAddrByDenomResponse, and QueryDenomRequest.
- Standardized field handling logic across request and response types.

Poem

In the meadow where code does play,
A rabbit hops, brightening the day.
With fixes and features, oh what a sight,
Building for Darwin, everything feels right!
New queries and structs, all in a row,
Hooray for the changes, let the progress flow! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/build-darwin-amd64.yml (2)

Line range hint 47-53: Consider using multi-line command syntax

Instead of using backslashes for line continuation, consider using the more readable multi-line command syntax in GitHub Actions:

-      - name: Build and Package for Darwin AMD64
-        run: |
-          cd ../minievm \
-          && make build \
-          && cd ./build \
-          && tar -czvf minievm_"$VERSION"_Darwin_"$ARCH_NAME".tar.gz ./minitiad \
-          && mv ./minievm_"$VERSION"_Darwin_"$ARCH_NAME".tar.gz $GITHUB_WORKSPACE/ \
-          && rm -rf ./minitiad
+      - name: Build and Package for Darwin AMD64
+        run: |
+          cd ../minievm
+          make build
+          cd ./build
+          tar -czvf minievm_"$VERSION"_Darwin_"$ARCH_NAME".tar.gz ./minitiad
+          mv ./minievm_"$VERSION"_Darwin_"$ARCH_NAME".tar.gz $GITHUB_WORKSPACE/
+          rm -rf ./minitiad
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)

48-48: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:5:55: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


The cd ../minievm navigation is incorrect and needs to be removed

The repository structure shows that we're already in the correct directory with the Makefile present at the root. The cd ../minievm command is incorrect as:

  1. The Makefile exists in the current directory
  2. There's no minievm directory in the parent path
  3. All other build workflow files also incorrectly use this same pattern

The build step should be simplified to:

      - name: Build and Package for Darwin AMD64
        run: |
          make build \
          && cd ./build \
          && tar -czvf minievm_"$VERSION"_Darwin_"$ARCH_NAME".tar.gz ./minitiad \
          && mv ./minievm_"$VERSION"_Darwin_"$ARCH_NAME".tar.gz $GITHUB_WORKSPACE/
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 47-53: Verify the directory navigation logic

The build step contains some concerning directory navigation:

  1. cd ../minievm moves to the parent directory and then into minievm. This seems unusual as the repository should already be in the correct directory after checkout.
  2. The artifacts are later moved back to $GITHUB_WORKSPACE.

Let's verify the repository structure:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the repository structure to understand the directory navigation

# Check if we're already in a minievm directory
pwd

# List contents of parent directory to see if there's another minievm directory
ls -la ../

# Check if Makefile exists in current directory
ls -la Makefile

Length of output: 644


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the repository structure and Makefile location more thoroughly

# Check the repository root structure
ls -la

# Check if there's any reference to ../minievm in workflow files
rg -l "../minievm" .github/workflows/

# Look for Makefile targets to understand build process
grep "^[a-zA-Z].*:" Makefile

# Check other workflow files for comparison
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ --exec head -n 1 {}

Length of output: 3513

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)

48-48: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:5:55: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ca0e8a and f900f67.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • api/minievm/evm/v1/query_grpc.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/build-darwin-amd64.yml (1 hunks)
  • api/minievm/evm/v1/query.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
api/minievm/evm/v1/query.pulsar.go (19)

Line range hint 1-1: LGTM!

The file header comment is correct and appropriate.


Line range hint 2-11: LGTM!

The import statements are correct and necessary for this generated code file.


Line range hint 13-1322: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryCodeRequest message type looks correct, including:

  • Struct definition
  • ProtoReflect and slowProtoReflect methods
  • Descriptor, Type, Interface, New methods
  • Range, Has, Clear, Get, Set, Mutable, NewField methods
  • WhichOneof method (though not applicable here)
  • GetUnknown, SetUnknown methods
  • IsValid method
  • ProtoMethods method

No issues found. The code generation appears comprehensive and follows protobuf best practices.


Line range hint 1324-2645: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryCodeResponse message type looks correct, similar to QueryCodeRequest. No issues found.


Line range hint 2647-4289: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryStateRequest message type looks correct, similar to previous message types. No issues found.


Line range hint 4291-5612: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryStateResponse message type looks correct, similar to previous message types. No issues found.


Line range hint 5614-6614: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryERC20FactoryRequest message type looks correct, similar to previous message types. No issues found.


Line range hint 6616-7937: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryERC20FactoryResponse message type looks correct, similar to previous message types. No issues found.


Line range hint 7939-8939: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryERC20WrapperRequest message type looks correct, similar to previous message types. No issues found.


Line range hint 8941-10262: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryERC20WrapperResponse message type looks correct, similar to previous message types. No issues found.


Line range hint 10264-11585: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryContractAddrByDenomRequest message type looks correct, similar to previous message types. No issues found.


Line range hint 11587-12908: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryContractAddrByDenomResponse message type looks correct, similar to previous message types. No issues found.


Line range hint 12910-14231: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryDenomRequest message type looks correct, similar to previous message types. No issues found.


Line range hint 14233-15554: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryDenomResponse message type looks correct, similar to previous message types. No issues found.


Line range hint 15556-17518: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryCallRequest message type looks correct, including the TraceOptions field. No issues found.


Line range hint 17520-18840: LGTM!

The generated code for the TraceOptions message type looks correct. No issues found.


Line range hint 18842-20805: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryCallResponse message type looks correct, including the repeated Log field. No issues found.


Line range hint 20807-21807: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryParamsRequest message type looks correct. No issues found.


Line range hint 21809-23130: LGTM!

The generated code for the QueryParamsResponse message type looks correct, including the Params field. No issues found.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant