Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ks contract versioning #2951
Ks contract versioning #2951
Changes from 9 commits
1bab5e2
a30b60a
4546003
ffa71b0
98489db
6855f95
278d5c8
a406244
6acef6e
59018a2
eb21f08
22fe0d7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@SaptakS @thelostone-mc do these migrations look ok to you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@captnseagraves
cc @owocki
Should we include a process for handling the ABI based on contract version, so it outputs the appropriate static URL or a given contract version..?
Also, we are we using a decimalfield if
decimal_places=0
withmax_digits=3
?Can we switch this to a charfield? If we're going by semantic versioning, decimalfield won't make sense:
0.1.0
for example. If we're using integers like:0
or1
, we should use positiveintegerfield here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this makes sense to me
as does this