Display Which Worker Was Approved

[PixelantDesign]

User Story

As a contributor or funder looking at the activity list, it's hard to tell who has actually been approved for work.

Why Is this Needed

Summary: It's unclear right now

Description

Type: Enhancement

Current Behavior

Does not say who has been approved

Expected Behavior

It should say who has been approved

Definition of Done

• It clearly states inline which worker has been approved.

Additional Information

In this scenario it should say: Worker Approved Evgeniuz

[usmanmuhd]

Can I take this up?

[owocki]

1. link to bounty pls?
2. if you scroll up there is a 'work started' section that will list evgenius in it.

[kuhnchris]

@owocki this is fine for the "first" worker applied, yes, but if you have dozens of applied workers who start/stop and then get approved then you kind of lose track who got approved when and where. Hence the "enhancement".

@usmanmuhd sure, if you find your way around, give it a try!

[pbteja1998]

Can I work on this issue ?

[kuhnchris]

No idea, @usmanmuhd is this still open?

[usmanmuhd]

Yeah sure, @pbteja1998 please take this up. I actually needed this for #2404 .

[pbteja1998]

I am trying to setup this repo locally. Everthing is fine except that I was unable to create funded issue. I am using Rinkeby test network. It has 18+ ether in it.
When I am trying to set the gas, it is showing unknown min confirmation.
Even if we ignore that time, when I clicked on fund issue, it is loading forever.
Can someone tell me what am I missing here? ( @usmanmuhd )

[kuhnchris]

please check the gas price DIRECTLY in metamask, for some reason my gas was reset to 1 GWEI, which was way too low. The unknown confirmation time is due to the missing gas cronjob that's running to determine the time (normal).
Can you check the logs (docker-compose logs --tail=100 web) ?

Thanks!

[pbteja1998]

How to start that cronjob?

[usmanmuhd]

I don't think you need to start the cronjob. You can just increase the gas from within metamask payment.

[pbteja1998]

The thing is it is not asking for payment in metamask. when I click on Fund Issue it is just loading. No prompt for payment in metamask !

[usmanmuhd]

Have you connected Gitcoin to metamask?

[pbteja1998]

yes

[pbteja1998]

I will try to rebuild again. Will see if it works.

[pbteja1998]

Is there anything else that I can do?

[pbteja1998]

• Cloned the repo
• cp app/app/local.env app/app/.env
  • BASE_URL=http://localhost:8000/
  • GITHUB_CLIENT_ID=xxxx
  • GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET=xxxx
  • GITHUB_APP_NAME=xxxx
• sudo docker-compose up --build

These are the steps that I followed for rebuilding. Still no luck !

[usmanmuhd]

DM on slack, we can try figuring out.

[thelostone-mc]

@usmanmuhd / @pbteja1998 lemme know if this works out. Else rope me into the conversation as well

[pbteja1998]

It is still unsolved

[kuhnchris]

How about the environment?
Linux? Mac? Windows?
What Browser?
Old Metamask? Incognito Mode?
Some more infos then we can help, else pm me on Slack/Discord

[thelostone-mc]

@pbteja1998 mind heading over to our community channel and dropping a ping with
me @kuhnchris and @usmanmuhd ?

[octavioamu]

Just a head up with this tasks I was discussing with @usmanmuhd and there are 2 ways at least to solve this issue, one is front end just using the data inside json metadata with worker_handle but he bring me the idea of change the model and I believe is the right way to go, because we actually have the other actions related to the worker not the owner, example
this is from activity related to this bounty https://gitcoin.co/issue/MyBitFoundation/MyBit.website/29/1953

As we see all the actions, removed, applied, stopped work are related to the worker (that is right) so I believe keeping the model with the owner name Approved doesn't make sense in the bounty or in the gitcoin.co/activity
So I believe we should change the field from the model to be filled with the worker and not the owner and that will be reflected in both places we need it.
@thelostone-mc any idea if this could break something in some place?