Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bootstrap a pricing engine by setting the scales manually #26

Closed
owocki opened this issue Oct 3, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

bootstrap a pricing engine by setting the scales manually #26

owocki opened this issue Oct 3, 2017 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
easy-pickings This is an easy issue for the community. Gitcoin Funder Form Gitcoin Funder Form help wanted

Comments

@owocki
Copy link
Contributor

owocki commented Oct 3, 2017

we could code up a little javascript interface where you slide a few things back and forth and it tells you what a fair bounty is

maybe on top of that, make it so that you enter a issue URL and we suggest values based upon NLP or the languages involved or wahtever

@owocki owocki mentioned this issue Oct 3, 2017
@owocki owocki added the easy-pickings This is an easy issue for the community. label Oct 3, 2017
@gamwe6
Copy link
Contributor

gamwe6 commented Oct 3, 2017

Did you decide which factors to use?

@owocki
Copy link
Contributor Author

owocki commented Oct 3, 2017

i think issue type, complexity, scope, deadline (how quick you need it?) and reputation are the obvious places to start. anyone strongly disagree?

@gamwe6
Copy link
Contributor

gamwe6 commented Oct 3, 2017

A quick bare draft with just level, time and type. For time, maybe use input text instead. https://codepen.io/anon/pen/NaaZPZ

@owocki
Copy link
Contributor Author

owocki commented Oct 3, 2017

@mbeylin what do you think of this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
easy-pickings This is an easy issue for the community. Gitcoin Funder Form Gitcoin Funder Form help wanted
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants