Added new SignToolHelper

[Bomret]

Created a new SignToolHelper that is more capable than the old SignHelper. I did not change that one because it might still be in use.

Relates to issue #533

[forki]

Do we want to mark the other one Obsolete?

[Bomret]

The new signer is capable of the same tasks as the old one and some new
ones (timestamping). So I'd say yes.
Am 04.09.2014 09:35 schrieb "Steffen Forkmann" [email protected]:

Do we want to mark the other one Obsolete?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#535 (comment).

[forki]

How about making the new one backwards compatible?
On Sep 4, 2014 12:48 PM, "Stefan Reichel" [email protected] wrote:

The new signer is capable of the same tasks as the old one and some new
ones (timestamping). So I'd say yes.
Am 04.09.2014 09:35 schrieb "Steffen Forkmann" [email protected]:

Do we want to mark the other one Obsolete?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#535 (comment).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#535 (comment).

[Bomret]

Hmmm, I'd have to port over the original method's signature. I could do
that tomorrow evening.
Am 04.09.2014 12:50 schrieb "Steffen Forkmann" [email protected]:

How about making the new one backwards compatible?
On Sep 4, 2014 12:48 PM, "Stefan Reichel" [email protected]
wrote:

The new signer is capable of the same tasks as the old one and some new
ones (timestamping). So I'd say yes.
Am 04.09.2014 09:35 schrieb "Steffen Forkmann" [email protected]:

Do we want to mark the other one Obsolete?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#535 (comment).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#535 (comment).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#535 (comment).

[forki]

Nice. That would make things so much more friendly
On Sep 4, 2014 2:31 PM, "Stefan Reichel" [email protected] wrote:

Hmmm, I'd have to port over the original method's signature. I could do
that tomorrow evening.
Am 04.09.2014 12:50 schrieb "Steffen Forkmann" [email protected]:

How about making the new one backwards compatible?
On Sep 4, 2014 12:48 PM, "Stefan Reichel" [email protected]
wrote:

The new signer is capable of the same tasks as the old one and some
new
ones (timestamping). So I'd say yes.
Am 04.09.2014 09:35 schrieb "Steffen Forkmann" <
[email protected]>:

Do we want to mark the other one Obsolete?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#535 (comment).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#535 (comment).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#535 (comment).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#535 (comment).

[Bomret]

I included the old SignHelper method in the new SignToolHelper module and marked it as obsolete. The old SignHelper type is still there and unchanged.

[forki]

thanks