Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add some fluentbit helm opts #743

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2023
Merged

Conversation

adiforluls
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Does this PR introduced a user-facing change?


Additional documentation, usage docs, etc.:


@adiforluls adiforluls marked this pull request as draft May 21, 2023 11:11
@benjaminhuo
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the PR.
Let us know when the PR is ready to be merged @adiforluls

@adiforluls adiforluls marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2023 04:49
@adiforluls
Copy link
Member Author

Just needed to test it, this is ready now @benjaminhuo

@adiforluls adiforluls merged commit c5babfb into fluent:master May 23, 2023
@adiforluls adiforluls deleted the aditya/helm-opts branch May 23, 2023 07:12
@@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ spec:
resources:
{{- toYaml .Values.fluentbit.resources | nindent 4 }}
fluentBitConfigName: fluent-bit-config
Copy link
Member

@benjaminhuo benjaminhuo May 23, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fluentBitConfigName and namespaceFluentBitCfgSelector should be mutually exclusive?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, the former is for ClusterFluentBitConfig CR, and the latter is for namespaced FluentBitConfig CR.

This was a mistake made by whoever created/generated the FluentBit CR, they named the field corresponding to cluster level config as fluentBitConfigName.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants