Skip to content

A CLI tool and GitHub Action to post Go code coverage reports as comment to your pull requests.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

fgrosse/go-coverage-report

Use this GitHub action with your project
Add this Action to an existing workflow or create a new one
View on Marketplace

Repository files navigation

Go Coverage Report

A CLI tool and GitHub Action to post Go code coverage reports as comment to your pull requests.


go-coverage-report is a command line tool and a GitHub Action that parses code coverage results to create a tabular code coverage report. This markdown report is intended as pull request comment both to highlight the impact of the changes on the code coverage on all updated packages and to motivate the contributors to write tests for their code.

The provided tool and GitHub Action work without any third-party services which makes them fast, secure and very easy-to-setup in your own CI/CD pipeline.

Example

Example of a pull request comment created by go-coverage-report:

Example of a pull request comment created by go-coverage-report

Please note that by default, the "Coverage by file" section is collapsed so the focus is more on the overall impact on the coverage per package.

There is no indicator of the total coverage of the project because the impact by changed package is typically a better indicator of the quality of the changes. Additionally, looking at coverage changes by package is more motivating as code coverage improvements are more pronounced (i.e. typically larger percentage values) when zooming into the package level, instead of comparing changes on the project level.

The last column is an emoji "score" that is based on the coverage change of the package. The following emojis are used:

  • 🌟 - The coverage of the package increased by > 20%
  • 🎉 - The coverage of the package increased by <= 20%
  • 👍 - The coverage of the package increased by <= 10%
  • 👎 - The coverage of the package decreased by <= 10%
  • 💀 - The coverage of the package decreased by > 10%, every 10% add another skull (up to five skulls)

Usage

The go-coverage-report tool ships with a GitHub Action that you can easily include in your own Workflows:

name: CI

# This setup assumes that you run the unit tests with code coverage in the same
# workflow that will also print the coverage report as comment to the pull request. 
# Therefore, you need to trigger this workflow when a pull request is (re)opened or
# when new code is pushed to the branch of the pull request. In addition, you also
# need to trigger this workflow when new code is pushed to the main branch because 
# we need to upload the code coverage results as artifact for the main branch as
# well since it will be the baseline code coverage.
# 
# We do not want to trigger the workflow for pushes to *any* branch because this
# would trigger our jobs twice on pull requests (once from "push" event and once
# from "pull_request->synchronize")
on:
  pull_request:
    types: [opened, reopened, synchronize]
  push:
    branches:
      - 'main'

jobs:
  unit_tests:
    name: "Unit tests"
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Checkout repository
        uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Setup Go
        uses: actions/setup-go@v4
        with:
          go-version: ^1.22

      # When you execute your unit tests, make sure to use the "-coverprofile" flag to write a 
      # coverage profile to a file. You will need the name of the file (e.g. "coverage.txt")
      # in the next step as well as the next job.
      - name: Test
        run: go test -cover -coverprofile=coverage.txt ./...

      - name: Archive code coverage results
        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        with:
          name: code-coverage
          path: coverage.txt # Make sure to use the same file name you chose for the "-coverprofile" in the "Test" step

  code_coverage:
    name: "Code coverage report"
    if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' # Do not run when workflow is triggered by push to main branch
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    needs: unit_tests # Depends on the artifact uploaded by the "unit_tests" job
    permissions:
      contents:      read
      actions:       read  # to download code coverage results from "test" job
      pull-requests: write # write permission needed to comment on PR
    steps:
      - uses: fgrosse/[email protected] # Consider using a Git revision for maximum security
        with:
          coverage-artifact-name: "code-coverage" # can be omitted if you used this default value
          coverage-file-name: "coverage.txt" # can be omitted if you used this default value

Inputs

inputs:
  version:
    description: 'The exact version tag of the go-coverage-report tool to use.'
    required: true
    default: "v1.2.0"

  sha256sum:
    description: 'Optional SHA256 checksum of the tarball when downloading the go-coverage-report binary.'
    required: false

  coverage-artifact-name:
    description: 'The name of the artifact containing the code coverage results.'
    required: true
    default: "code-coverage"

  coverage-file-name:
    description: 'The name of the file containing the code coverage results.'
    required: true
    default: "coverage.txt"

  root-package:
    description: |
      The Go import path of the tested repository to add as a prefix to all paths of the
      changed files. This is useful to map the changed files (e.g., ["foo/my_file.go"]
      to their coverage profile which uses the full package name to identify the files
      (e.g., "github.com/fgrosse/example/foo/my_file.go"). Note that currently, 
      packages with a different name than their directory are not supported.
    required: false
    default: "github.com/${{ github.repository }}"

  skip-comment:
    description: |
      Skip creating or updating the pull request comment. This may be useful when you want
      to generate the coverage report and modify it in your own scripts.
    required: false
    default: 'false'

  trim:
    description: Trim a prefix in the "Impacted Packages" column of the markdown report.
    required: false

  github-baseline-workflow-ref:
    description: |
      The ref of the GitHub actions Workflow that produces the baseline coverage.
      By default, the GitHub Actions Workflow ref is used
      (e.g. "octocat/hello-world/.github/workflows/my-workflow.yml@refs/heads/my_branch").
      You can aso just pass the name of the Workflow file directly (e.g. "my-workflow.yml").
    default: ${{ github.workflow_ref }}
    required: false

Outputs

This action provides the following outputs:

  • coverage_report: The generated coverage report in Markdown format.

Limitations

  • Currently, code coverage profiles are uploaded as GitHub artifacts which automatically expire after 90 days. In a repository which receives changes only infrequently, this might lead to issues when trying to compare the code coverage of a pull request with the code coverage of the main branch (see #5).
  • Support for forks is limited since the necessary GITHUB_TOKEN permissions don't allow to post comments to the pull request of the base repository (see #15). If forks are important for you, this action might not be the best solution.
  • Packages with a name that differs from their directory on disk are not supported yet.
  • Requires actions/upload-artifact >= v4 (see this issue).

Built With

Contributing

Please read CONTRIBUTING.md for details on our code of conduct and on the process for submitting pull requests to this repository.

Versioning

We use SemVer for versioning. All significant (e.g. breaking) changes are documented in the CHANGELOG.md. A list of all available versions can be found at the releases page.

Authors

  • Friedrich Große - Initial work - fgrosse

  • See also the list of contributors who participated in this project.

License

This project is licensed under the BSD-3-Clause License - see the LICENSE file for details.

About

A CLI tool and GitHub Action to post Go code coverage reports as comment to your pull requests.

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Contributors 4

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •