Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Add release workflow with SBOM and attestation #68

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

emgrav
Copy link
Member

@emgrav emgrav commented Sep 18, 2024

No description provided.

@emgrav emgrav requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2024 12:23
@emgrav emgrav force-pushed the egraven/release-workflow branch 5 times, most recently from f22b3ee to 451505a Compare September 18, 2024 12:32
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 18, 2024

LCOV of commit 534eef5 during Rust workflow #374

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 85.8% (991 of 1155 lines)
  functions..: 49.3% (231 of 469 functions)
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate: n/a

@emgrav emgrav force-pushed the egraven/release-workflow branch 2 times, most recently from 8fd3f1c to 381a116 Compare September 18, 2024 13:53
tlater-famedly
tlater-famedly previously approved these changes Sep 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@tlater-famedly tlater-famedly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I guess the idea is to use ldap-sync as a test bed for this too, then move it to the shared workflows?

.github/workflows/release.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/release.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@emgrav
Copy link
Member Author

emgrav commented Sep 18, 2024

Yep

@emgrav emgrav force-pushed the egraven/release-workflow branch from 796d102 to 534eef5 Compare September 19, 2024 12:37
@emgrav emgrav merged commit 534eef5 into main Sep 19, 2024
3 checks passed
@emgrav emgrav deleted the egraven/release-workflow branch September 19, 2024 12:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants