You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On the current release of rapid a double right click does NOT add a node to a feature. With this version it does? Is this expected? If this is a new design choice I can live with it (but I don't like it :))
This gets me screwed up because I often choose a feature with the left click and then want to bring up the menu with the right click, but now that adds a node! I see that now I don't need the first left click to select the feature before bringing up the menu - I like that, but I personally don't think that right clicking on a feature should add a node.
Version
2.00-alpha.3
What browser are you seeing the problem on? What version are you running?
Chrome v107.0
Steps to reproduce
Double right click on a way between two nodes and one will be added.
The browser URL at the time you encountered the bug
Description
On the current release of rapid a double right click does NOT add a node to a feature. With this version it does? Is this expected? If this is a new design choice I can live with it (but I don't like it :))
This gets me screwed up because I often choose a feature with the left click and then want to bring up the menu with the right click, but now that adds a node! I see that now I don't need the first left click to select the feature before bringing up the menu - I like that, but I personally don't think that right clicking on a feature should add a node.
Version
2.00-alpha.3
What browser are you seeing the problem on? What version are you running?
Chrome v107.0
Steps to reproduce
Double right click on a way between two nodes and one will be added.
The browser URL at the time you encountered the bug
https://mapwith.ai/rapid-v2-alpha3#background=Bing&datasets=fbRoads,msBuildings&disable_features=boundaries&id=w163740253&map=20.72/40.66765/-74.18124
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: