Flake improvments #93
Conversation
(because that is the purpose of that command as far as I understand it)
| self | ||
| , flake-utils | ||
| , naersk | ||
| , nixpkgs | ||
| , treefmt-nix | ||
| , rust-overlay |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I actually prefer this, it's the same style that https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs uses.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There seems to already have been a lot of discussion on the topic: kamadorueda/alejandra#95
I don't care that much at the end of the day. I use alejandra because I found it's formatting pretty helpful but unintrusive working with it. (Style discussions are some of the most annoying things devs - let's be honest - fight about imo)
Judging by context I assume you don't insist on using something else?!
| @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| projectRootFile = "Cargo.toml"; | |||
| programs = { | |||
| # alejandra.enable = true; | |||
| alejandra.enable = true; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't know this package, but I'm gonna check it out!
|
Regarding #75: I went looking for the tests because they did not show up here but I think that might be because they aren't yet in the tree of this branch (?! idk) edit: ah no. i think it's because the paths aren't in there. makes sense |
Sounds plausible, but annoying. Maybe I'll try merging main into a PR and see if it triggers CI. |
Tracking issue: #72
nix flake checkcargo testwhen building via flake to ensure working output