-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
core/txpool: move some validation to outside of mutex #27006
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
300ef9d
core/txpool: move some validation to outside of mutex
holiman 0defec2
Update core/txpool/txpool.go
holiman acbc02a
Update txpool.go
holiman e3ce6ca
core/txpool: fix test regression due to changed order of checks
holiman 0ceb08f
core/txpool: drop basics-validation internally
holiman File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could skip this check, but that would require a bit of analysis that we don't hit some quirky edgecase due to the pool behavioural changes when a hardfork happens.
Like, we first validateBasics on
x
before shanghai, accept, then somehow the block withx
is dropped, sox
is re-added, but now we're past shanghai and the rule about initcode size must be enforced. So now we would addx
to pending, but it cannot be added in a block.If that's the "extent of the damage" then I guess we can drop the check here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
honestly I feel this check is unnecessary. I think the check in txpool doesn't need to be very strict.
Like the init-code-size check raised in shanghai, it's totally possible that the "large-code" transactions are accepted before the fork and stay in pool for long time because of low gas price. These transactions will be filtered out in miner.
So another question is: if these transactions are accepted into pool, how can they get evicted? Feel like they will stay until get evicted because of low price.