Rebase EIP-4844 on Capella #3052

Inphi · 2022-10-20T14:36:55Z

Also adds a "testing" specification that allows withdrawals to be disabled during testing.

This also introduces an `ENABLE_WITHDRAWALS` feature-flag to allow implementers test EIP-4844 without including Capella-specific state changes.

hwwhww · 2022-10-20T16:05:19Z

address #3044

specs/eip4844/beacon-chain.md

hwwhww

Had a quick scan, @Inphi well done on the rebasing!

Note that Withdrawals into queue in single function #3042 changed the consensus containers & epoch processing functions. So if we include it, you'd need to update that part.
From pyspec's point of view, having ENABLE_WITHDRAWALS is kinda annoying 😬 but I'd defer to client devs if they really want this flag control in spec.

specs/eip4844/beacon-chain.md

hwwhww · 2022-10-20T16:18:42Z

specs/eip4844/beacon-chain.md

+    if ENABLE_WITHDRAWALS:  # [New in EIP-4844]
+        for_ops(body.bls_to_execution_changes, process_bls_to_execution_change)


That means we have to replace @with_capella_and_later decorator in tests with @with_phases([CAPELLA]) if we treat ENABLE_WITHDRAWALS == 0 as a constant.

And if we want to have the flexibility to test ENABLE_WITHDRAWALS == 1, we need to write a new decorator to check preset before running the test.

hwwhww · 2022-10-20T16:19:48Z

specs/eip4844/fork.md

+Since the `eip4844.BeaconState` format is equal to the `Capella.BeaconState` format, we only have to update `BeaconState.fork`.

 ```python
-def upgrade_to_eip4844(pre: bellatrix.BeaconState) -> BeaconState:
-    # TODO: if Capella gets scheduled, add sync it with Capella.BeaconState
-    epoch = bellatrix.get_current_epoch(pre)
+def upgrade_to_eip4844(pre: Capella.BeaconState) -> BeaconState:


It's lowercase capella for the pyspec library.

terencechain · 2022-10-20T17:45:57Z

Had a quick scan, @Inphi well done on the rebasing!

* Note that #3042 changed the consensus containers & epoch processing functions. So if we include it, you'd need to update that part.

* From pyspec's point of view, having `ENABLE_WITHDRAWALS` is kinda annoying 😬  but I'd defer to client devs if they really want this flag control in spec.

Ditto. I don't think we should enshrine test-only flag in the spec. The decision on whether withdrawal is enabled or in the protocol for testing and testnet can be reached out of the band

Inphi · 2022-10-20T18:04:37Z

The goal is to align the behavior of disabling withdrawals across all clients. ENABLE_WITHDRAWALS will be removed eventually upon further testing. But right now, we're trying to avoid any withdrawal bugs or changes in the spec from influencing 4844.

Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <[email protected]>

realbigsean · 2022-10-20T20:08:47Z

In testnets we can avoid worrying too much about the impact of withdrawals on consensus by stubbing out these functions:

Epoch processing:
-process_full_withdrawals
-process_partial_withdrawals

Block processing:

process_withdrawals
for_ops(body.bls_to_execution_changes)

But I think we can figure this out on a per-testnet basis, by saying "target this spec commit but stub out these functions" rather than ingraining this in the spec here

I think it's simpler if we don't touch anything else, for example:

Actually get the root of an empty withdrawals list
Keep an empty withdrawals list in payload attributes
Use EIP4844 + withdrawal types in all APIs

And remove the ENABLE_WITHDRAWALS feature-flag. The Testing section in the spec has been updated to specify how withdrawals is to be disabled

Inphi · 2022-10-24T16:56:31Z

@realbigsean Thanks for the suggestions. I've made the changes to the spec. ENABLE_WITHDRAWALS has been removed and I've updated the Testing section to specify how clients can disable withdrawals.

specs/eip4844/beacon-chain.md

Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <[email protected]>

hwwhww · 2022-10-26T15:49:16Z

Marked it "DO NOT MERGE" since we have to swap the no-op functions in pyspec internally + fix tests. I can work on it but I'm pretty afk this week. 🙏

hwwhww

I managed to make withdrawal functions no-op & add basic tests, and find okay Wi-Fi somewhere 2km far from Machu Picchu. 😄

The functionalities/correctness LGTM now!

Edited: I'll defer to client devs to make the decision in testing. Although I personally found that the no-op stub is still somewhat annoying. 😅

Inphi · 2022-11-10T19:32:03Z

I've updated the PR for #3068. Reviewers please take another look.

terencechain

Great work @Inphi ! Just one question

terencechain · 2022-11-11T02:48:43Z

specs/eip4844/p2p-interface.md

@@ -140,6 +141,7 @@ Per `context = compute_fork_digest(fork_version, genesis_validators_root)`:
 | `GENESIS_FORK_VERSION`   | `phase0.SignedBeaconBlock` |
 | `ALTAIR_FORK_VERSION`    | `altair.SignedBeaconBlock` |
 | `BELLATRIX_FORK_VERSION` | `bellatrix.SignedBeaconBlock` |
+| `CAPELLA_FORK_VERSION`   | `capella.SignedBeaconBlock`   |


Potential merge conflict with #3089. I can fix that after this is merged

fixed in f1d4c90

terencechain · 2022-11-11T02:49:54Z

specs/eip4844/validator.md


-```python
-def get_blobs_and_kzg_commitments(payload_id: PayloadId) -> Tuple[Sequence[BLSFieldElement], Sequence[KZGCommitment]]:


get_blobs_and_kzg_commitments is still mentioned below, do we want to remove this?

Good catch. This was a bad merge from dev. I've added it back in. Thanks.

hwwhww

lgtm!

I have a test vector generator branch (https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/compare/pr3052-testgen) based on this PR. I'll open a PR once this one is merged.

specs/eip4844/beacon-chain.md

djrtwo · 2022-11-15T14:14:52Z

specs/eip4844/beacon-chain.md

@@ -335,3 +342,10 @@ def initialize_beacon_state_from_eth1(eth1_block_hash: Hash32,

    return state
 ```
+
+### Disabling Withdrawals
+During testing we avoid Capella-specific updates to the state transition. We do this by replacing the following functions with a no-op implementation:


This no-op works fine for clients?
I'm out of the loop, but I thought they would use the full functionality here (yes, complicating testing)

We want to avoid submitted withdrawals from interfering with the testnet. By no-op'ing these functions, withdrawals won't have any effect.

djrtwo · 2022-11-15T14:19:38Z

...s/core/pyspec/eth2spec/test/capella/block_processing/test_process_bls_to_execution_change.py

 @spec_state_test
 def test_success(spec, state):
    signed_address_change = get_signed_address_change(spec, state)
    yield from run_bls_to_execution_change_processing(spec, state, signed_address_change)


-@with_capella_and_later
+@with_phases([CAPELLA])


This should be capella and later, no?

Ah, the no-op change will break this test... If we do this, we need to remember to go back and change these all :/
When we were rebasing here, I didn't realize we were rebasing and mutating. How much will we be blocked on 4844 if we don't do the capella no-op within 4844 spec?

My understanding is to prevent random semi-public testnet users/validators from invoking any withdrawals?

Agreed with this complicating testing but given that we have 3-4 in-discussion changes on Capella, it makes sense that EIP-4844 devs want to disable Capella now... 😭

Btw I also added the tests to test the Capella no-op. So we must undo it altogether.

My understanding is to prevent random semi-public testnet users/validators from invoking any withdrawals?

Yes it's exactly this.

djrtwo

okay, I'm fine with it, assuming that clients can no-op functions for a fork without too much issue.

approved

Rebase Capella on EIP-4844

242e1b7

This also introduces an `ENABLE_WITHDRAWALS` feature-flag to allow implementers test EIP-4844 without including Capella-specific state changes.

timbeiko mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2022

Consensus-layer Call 97 ethereum/pm#630

Closed

Inphi changed the title ~~Rebase Capella on EIP-4844~~ Rebase EIP-4844 on Capella Oct 20, 2022

hwwhww added the Deneb was called: eip-4844 label Oct 20, 2022

terencechain reviewed Oct 20, 2022

View reviewed changes

specs/eip4844/beacon-chain.md Show resolved Hide resolved

hwwhww reviewed Oct 20, 2022

View reviewed changes

Update specs/eip4844/beacon-chain.md

f6f2474

Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <[email protected]>

timbeiko mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2022

EIP-4844 Implementers' Call #1 ethereum/pm#647

Closed

Inphi added 2 commits October 24, 2022 12:44

Fix py setup

2ac57c7

And remove the ENABLE_WITHDRAWALS feature-flag. The Testing section in the spec has been updated to specify how withdrawals is to be disabled

remove unchanged epoch processing section

0488c0c

Inphi added 2 commits October 24, 2022 16:25

Fix test_process_execution_payload

459310f

Add CAPELLA_FORK_EPOCH overrides

6d270cd

ralexstokes reviewed Oct 25, 2022

View reviewed changes

specs/eip4844/beacon-chain.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Update specs/eip4844/beacon-chain.md

ca538f5

Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <[email protected]>

Inphi marked this pull request as ready for review October 25, 2022 16:06

hwwhww added the DO NOT MERGE label Oct 26, 2022

hwwhww added 3 commits October 26, 2022 15:06

Make pyspec disable withdrawal-functions in EIP4844

3172095

Add tests for no-op functions

e460005

Add test_process_withdrawals no-op test

60187e5

hwwhww removed the DO NOT MERGE label Oct 26, 2022

hwwhww approved these changes Oct 26, 2022

View reviewed changes

hwwhww requested a review from ralexstokes October 26, 2022 20:39

dgcoffman mentioned this pull request Nov 1, 2022

EIP-4844 dgcoffman/lodestar#1

Draft

25 tasks

jessepollak mentioned this pull request Nov 1, 2022

EIP-4844 Implementers' Call #2 ethereum/pm#650

Closed

Inphi added 2 commits November 10, 2022 14:11

remove eip4844 partial/full withdrawwals tests

fcafdc1

remove eip4844 epoch_processing package

67ba28c

Inphi requested review from realbigsean, terencechain, djrtwo and hwwhww and removed request for ralexstokes, realbigsean, terencechain and djrtwo November 10, 2022 19:32

terencechain reviewed Nov 11, 2022

View reviewed changes

replace get_blobs_and_kzg_commitments

104cba0

hwwhww approved these changes Nov 11, 2022

View reviewed changes

ralexstokes reviewed Nov 11, 2022

View reviewed changes

specs/eip4844/beacon-chain.md Show resolved Hide resolved

Inphi added 4 commits November 11, 2022 17:24

rename excess_blobs

6327ffa

excess_data_gas uint256

cd1e113

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/dev' into inphi/eip4844-rebase

3df1371

Fix merge conflict

3714446

timbeiko mentioned this pull request Nov 14, 2022

EIP-4844 Implementers' Call #4 ethereum/pm#663

Closed

djrtwo reviewed Nov 15, 2022

View reviewed changes

tbenr mentioned this pull request Nov 16, 2022

Fix latest_execution_payload_header field in eip4844 state upgrade #3106

Merged

hwwhww added 2 commits November 18, 2022 02:12

Merge branch 'dev' into pr3052

f1d4c90

Merge branch 'dev' into pr3052

ee0e2a0

djrtwo approved these changes Nov 17, 2022

View reviewed changes

hwwhww merged commit 78f0e03 into ethereum:dev Nov 17, 2022

hwwhww mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2022

Rebase 4844 on Capella #3044

Closed

tbenr mentioned this pull request Nov 21, 2022

change excess_blobs: uint64 to excess_data_gas: uint256 Consensys/teku#6479

Closed

protolambda mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2022

Shanghai Planning ethereum/pm#450

Closed

Inphi deleted the inphi/eip4844-rebase branch February 20, 2024 15:59

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Rebase EIP-4844 on Capella #3052

Rebase EIP-4844 on Capella #3052

Inphi commented Oct 20, 2022 •

edited

Loading

hwwhww commented Oct 20, 2022

hwwhww left a comment

hwwhww Oct 20, 2022

hwwhww Oct 20, 2022

terencechain commented Oct 20, 2022

Inphi commented Oct 20, 2022

realbigsean commented Oct 20, 2022

Inphi commented Oct 24, 2022 •

edited

Loading

hwwhww commented Oct 26, 2022 •

edited

Loading

hwwhww left a comment •

edited

Loading

Inphi commented Nov 10, 2022

terencechain left a comment

terencechain Nov 11, 2022

hwwhww Nov 17, 2022

terencechain Nov 11, 2022

Inphi Nov 11, 2022

hwwhww left a comment

djrtwo Nov 15, 2022

Inphi Nov 16, 2022

djrtwo Nov 15, 2022

hwwhww Nov 15, 2022

Inphi Nov 16, 2022

djrtwo left a comment

		if ENABLE_WITHDRAWALS: # [New in EIP-4844]
		for_ops(body.bls_to_execution_changes, process_bls_to_execution_change)


		```python
		def get_blobs_and_kzg_commitments(payload_id: PayloadId) -> Tuple[Sequence[BLSFieldElement], Sequence[KZGCommitment]]:

Rebase EIP-4844 on Capella #3052

Rebase EIP-4844 on Capella #3052

Conversation

Inphi commented Oct 20, 2022 • edited Loading

hwwhww commented Oct 20, 2022

hwwhww left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

terencechain commented Oct 20, 2022

Inphi commented Oct 20, 2022

realbigsean commented Oct 20, 2022

Inphi commented Oct 24, 2022 • edited Loading

hwwhww commented Oct 26, 2022 • edited Loading

hwwhww left a comment • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Inphi commented Nov 10, 2022

terencechain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

hwwhww left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

djrtwo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Inphi commented Oct 20, 2022 •

edited

Loading

Inphi commented Oct 24, 2022 •

edited

Loading

hwwhww commented Oct 26, 2022 •

edited

Loading

hwwhww left a comment •

edited

Loading