fix: Improve RPCRes JSON test suite

[mr-teikst]

Description

This pull request improves the RPCRes JSON test suite in the proxyd package. The changes include:

• Using more descriptive test case descriptions
• Using a consistent data type (byte slice) for the ID across test cases
• Replacing require.NoError with assert.NoError for more targeted assertions
• Adding a comment to clarify the expected behavior for the "RPCRes with error result with data" test case

These changes make the test suite more readable and maintainable.

Tests

The existing test suite has been updated to include the improvements mentioned in the description. No new tests have been added, as the focus of this PR is on improving the existing test coverage.

Additional context

The RPCRes struct is a core part of the proxyd package, and it's important to ensure its JSON marshaling behavior is thoroughly tested. These changes help to improve the robustness and clarity of the test suite.

Metadata

• Fixes automatically deploys builds from master to synthetix-dev #123 (Link to the issue this PR addresses)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Enhanced the clarity of test descriptions in RPC tests.
  • Transitioned from require to assert assertions to improve test flexibility.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes primarily involve a modification in the testing approach within the proxyd/rpc_test.go file, where assert is now used in place of require for the test function TestRPCResJSON. This is accompanied by enhanced descriptive strings for test scenarios. Additionally, there is an initiative to automate deployment of builds from the master branch to synthetix-dev.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
proxyd/rpc_test.go	Replaced require with assert; improved descriptive strings in test cases

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Automatically deploys builds from master to synthetix-dev (#123)	❌	No changes related to deployment automation noticed.

The provided summary does not indicate any modifications or additions to the deployment process, which is the core requirement of linked issue #123. Thus, it appears that this objective has not been addressed in the changes detailed.

---

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0913776 and 71f1558.

Files selected for processing (1)

• proxyd/rpc_test.go (7 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (6)

proxyd/rpc_test.go (6)

17-17: Updated test description enhances clarity.

---

26-26: Clear and descriptive test case name.

---

39-39: Descriptive test case name improves test readability.

---

48-48: Test description update is clear and informative.

---

60-60: Enhanced test description aids in understanding the test's intent.

---

86-87: Switching to assert.NoError allows the test suite to continue after failures, improving error reporting.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.