xfrm: Don't use sk_family for socket policy lookups

On IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses sk_family is AF_INET6, but the flow informations are created based on AF_INET. So the routing set up 'struct flowi4' but we try to access 'struct flowi6' what leads to an out of bounds access. Fix this by using the family we get with the dst_entry, like we do it for the standard policy lookup. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]> Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <[email protected]>
emutex · Feb 14, 2017 · 4c86d77 · 4c86d77
1 parent c282222
commit 4c86d77
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 5 deletions.
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1248,16 +1248,15 @@ static inline int policy_to_flow_dir(int dir)
 }
 
 static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(const struct sock *sk, int dir,
-						 const struct flowi *fl)
+						 const struct flowi *fl, u16 family)
 {
 	struct xfrm_policy *pol;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
  again:
 	pol = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_policy[dir]);
 	if (pol != NULL) {
-		bool match = xfrm_selector_match(&pol->selector, fl,
-						 sk->sk_family);
+		bool match = xfrm_selector_match(&pol->selector, fl, family);
 		int err = 0;
 
 		if (match) {
@@ -2253,7 +2252,7 @@ struct dst_entry *xfrm_lookup(struct net *net, struct dst_entry *dst_orig,
 	sk = sk_const_to_full_sk(sk);
 	if (sk && sk->sk_policy[XFRM_POLICY_OUT]) {
 		num_pols = 1;
-		pols[0] = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, fl);
+		pols[0] = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, fl, family);
 		err = xfrm_expand_policies(fl, family, pols,
 					   &num_pols, &num_xfrms);
 		if (err < 0)
@@ -2532,7 +2531,7 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	pol = NULL;
 	sk = sk_to_full_sk(sk);
 	if (sk && sk->sk_policy[dir]) {
-		pol = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, dir, &fl);
+		pol = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, dir, &fl, family);
 		if (IS_ERR(pol)) {
 			XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINPOLERROR);
 			return 0;