-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Java.Interop] Allow JniRuntime init from JavaVM* and JNIEnv* #1158
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -36,6 +36,25 @@ public void JDK_OnlySupportsOneVM () | |
Assert.Fail ("Expected NotSupportedException; got: {0}", e); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
[Test] | ||
public void UseInvocationPointerOnNewThread () | ||
Comment on lines
+40
to
+41
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This file is old, but could we start adding new tests with the pattern: public async Task UseInvocationPointerOnNewThread ()
{
await Task.Run(() => ...);
} There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @jonathanpeppers: what's the benefit to using the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I cringe when I see |
||
{ | ||
var InvocationPointer = JniRuntime.CurrentRuntime.InvocationPointer; | ||
|
||
var t = new Thread (() => { | ||
try { | ||
var second = new JreRuntimeOptions () { | ||
InvocationPointer = InvocationPointer, | ||
}.CreateJreVM (); | ||
} | ||
catch (Exception e) { | ||
Assert.Fail ("Expected no exception, got: {0}", e); | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
t.Start (); | ||
t.Join (); | ||
} | ||
#endif // !__ANDROID__ | ||
|
||
[Test] | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is
Collection<string>
? I've never heard of this? It would be an API break to change it, so probably can't be aList<string>
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Collection<T>
. It's existed since .NET Framework 2.0, and is the recommended collection type in the .NET Framework Design Guidelines:This isn't an API break because the type hasn't changed at all, and -- again --
Collection<T>
is in fact the preferred collection type here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TIL,
List
vsCollection
: https://stackoverflow.com/a/271842There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Additionally, we've never "shipped"
Java.Runtime.Environment.dll
, so I'm fine witih making API breaks here if warranted.