Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: factor out CDP message types #13501

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 27, 2022

Conversation

crowlKats
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

cli/inspector_structures.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cli/tools/coverage/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cli/tools/repl/channel.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cli/inspector_structures.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@lucacasonato lucacasonato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bartlomieju
Copy link
Member

Maybe rename to refactor: factor out CDP message types?

@ry
Copy link
Member

ry commented Jan 27, 2022

What does this feature do?

@crowlKats crowlKats changed the title feat(cli): Devtools Protocol Structs refactor: factor out CDP message types Jan 27, 2022
@bartlomieju
Copy link
Member

What does this feature do?

Not a feature, refactor that is a prerequisite for #12899

@crowlKats crowlKats merged commit 382a978 into denoland:main Jan 27, 2022
@crowlKats crowlKats deleted the inspector_structs branch January 27, 2022 14:09
bartlomieju added a commit to bartlomieju/deno that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2022
bartlomieju added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2022
crowlKats added a commit to crowlKats/deno that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2022
ry pushed a commit to ry/deno that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
ry pushed a commit to ry/deno that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
bartlomieju added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants