Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 'smart_format' to LiveTranscriptionOptions #56

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 17, 2023

Conversation

corlinp
Copy link
Contributor

@corlinp corlinp commented Jul 7, 2023

Defined in https://developers.deepgram.com/reference/streaming but not yet included in the streaming API request.

@corlinp corlinp changed the title Add 'smart_format' to transcriptions Add 'smart_format' to LiveTranscriptionOptions Jul 7, 2023
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ type LiveTranscriptionOptions struct {
Numbers bool `json:"numbers" url:"numbers,omitempty" `
Numerals bool `json:"numerals" url:"numerals,omitempty" `
Profanity_filter bool `json:"profanity_filter" url:"profanity_filter,omitempty" `
Smart_format bool `json:"smart_format" url:"smart_format,omitempty" `
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you move it in the list so that it comes after Search and before Tag (to keep alphabetical order of properties)?

Thanks for the submission! Looking forward to getting it merged in.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I didn't notice the alphabetical order - done!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your contribution!

@SandraRodgers SandraRodgers merged commit aa510f9 into deepgram:main Jul 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants