Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dagster-azure] explicitly support access key and sas token in compute log manager #26653

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dpeng817/parametrizable_test
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dpeng817
Copy link
Contributor

@dpeng817 dpeng817 commented Dec 20, 2024

Summary & Motivation

Adds back support of asset keys and sas tokens to the azure compute log manager under a new configurable parameter;
access_key_or_sas_token. I'm torn on whether these should be two separate variables, but since they're handled identically it seems reasonable to have them live in the same field. Downside is ugly name.

We should also add back support for credential under the old name and issue a deprecation warning.

How I Tested These Changes

Added a new parametrization of the compute log manager integration test suite. Currently failing in bk because credentials need to be rotated, but passes local for me with a real access key.

Changelog

[dagster-azure] A new access_key_or_sas_token parameter to the AzureBlobComputeLogManager, which allows you to authenticate via either access key or sas token.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@dpeng817 dpeng817 requested a review from mlarose December 20, 2024 21:53
@dpeng817 dpeng817 changed the title [dagster-azure] add access key for azure compute log manager. [dagster-azure] explicitly support access key and sas token in compute log manager Dec 20, 2024
@dpeng817 dpeng817 marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2024 22:01
@ion-elgreco
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants