-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cylc play
(restart): fix bug affecting run host reinvocation after interactive upgrade
#6267
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI, I purposefully did not propagate the
options
object down the call chain. IMO it's a good idea to abstract out the CLI interfaces higher up in the call chain to keep the underlying code more abstract. The more you propagate CLI logic down the call stack, the harder it is to, for example, open a Python API later, or create a wrapper command, you also need to mock more in order to test and typing is less effective too (we know we're getting aValues
object, but we don't know whether it has anupgrade
option.Not a blocker, but better before IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think ideally we want to only alter
options.upgrade
in the case of an interactive upgrade, so the simplest way of doing this is passing in theoptions
object to_version_check
.It is a shame about the type-looseness of it, but at least it is relatively easy to test these functions by importing and using
RunOptions
(no need for mocking).cylc-flow/cylc/flow/option_parsers.py
Lines 569 to 570 in 6eb8f61
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
options.update = _version_check(db_file, options.upgrade, options.downgrade)
would have done it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are pathways it returns
True
without interactive upgrade