barberry (bump SDK v0.47.3) #3810
Conversation
faddat
requested review from
colin-axner,
AdityaSripal,
crodriguezvega,
charleenfei,
damiannolan,
chatton and
DimitrisJim
as code owners
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, @faddat! I only left one comment: I think we should bump go version in a separate PR.
|
Sure thing, sorry about the duplication here. I'll take care of that right now also |
|
@crodriguezvega hey another thing I should make you aware of with this one -- it moves go.work.example to go.work, I am going to make that a separate PR though. I think we should do that because it is the way that Osmosis is handling this, and it is really nice. Basically, we can: keep go.work.sum in .gitignotre this way when a dev sits down to work, they can go work syncand everything goes great. I usually label the resulting commit "sync" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice! 🙏 @faddat. We will back port this to v7.2, once we open that release branch.
* barberry * sync * add replaces for goleveldb * move back to go 1.19 * move go.work back to go.work.example (cherry picked from commit cf593b7) # Conflicts: # e2e/go.mod # e2e/go.sum # go.mod # go.sum # modules/capability/go.mod # modules/capability/go.sum
* barberry (bump SDK v0.47.3) (#3810) * barberry * sync * add replaces for goleveldb * move back to go 1.19 * move go.work back to go.work.example (cherry picked from commit cf593b7) # Conflicts: # e2e/go.mod # e2e/go.sum # go.mod # go.sum # modules/capability/go.mod # modules/capability/go.sum * fix conflicts/add changelog --------- Co-authored-by: Jacob Gadikian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <[email protected]>
This PR patches ibc-go for barberry, which also means making a few other version
bumps, too.