imp: represent unlimited approvals with MaxUint256 value (backport #3454) #3580
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![mergify[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/10562?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
* imp: represent unlimited approvals with a nil value * CHANGELOG * Update CHANGELOG.md * fix: updated unlimited spending limit to be represented with the MaxInt64 * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> * Update CHANGELOG.md Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> * fix: lint * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go * fix: update failing test and add test case suggested in review * fix: moved isAllowedAddress check before coin loop * fix: use maxUint256 case so it aligns with what's being passed from the EVM extension * refactor transfer authz to remove coins iteration in favour of explicit amount checking * make format * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> * fix: add the Authorization to Updated. * moving allowlist check to before spend limit logic * Apply suggestions from code review * fix: add comment to spend limit check * review feedback * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> * Update docs/apps/transfer/authorizations.md * fix: changed to new sentinel value name --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 7e6eb4c) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # e2e/tests/core/client_test.go # e2e/testsuite/grpc_query.go # modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go # modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization_test.go
mergify
bot
requested review from
colin-axner,
AdityaSripal and
damiannolan
as code owners
mergify
bot
requested review from
crodriguezvega,
charleenfei and
chatton
as code owners
damiannolan
approved these changes
May 15, 2023
| @@ -9,10 +14,11 @@ import ( | |||
| host "github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/v6/modules/core/24-host" | |||
| ) | |||
|
|
|||
| const gasCostPerIteration = uint64(10) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Removed this in favour of ctx.KVGasConfig().IterNextCostFlat below. Considering v6.2.0 is the introduction of the authz feature to the v6 line I thought it was best to align with what is on main.
DimitrisJim
approved these changes
May 15, 2023
crodriguezvega
approved these changes
May 15, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #3454 done by Mergify.
Cherry-pick of 7e6eb4c has failed:
To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally
Mergify commands and options
More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.
You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:
@Mergifyio refreshwill re-evaluate the rules@Mergifyio rebasewill rebase this PR on its base branch@Mergifyio updatewill merge the base branch into this PR@Mergifyio backport <destination>will backport this PR on<destination>branchAdditionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:
Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com