Add missing query for next sequence send

[expertdicer]

Description

closes: #3383

Commit Message / Changelog Entry

type: commit message

see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

• Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
• Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
• Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
• Wrote unit and integration tests.
• Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/).
• Added relevant godoc comments.
• Provide a commit message to be used for the changelog entry in the PR description for review.
• Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer.
• Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #3417 (549868a) into main (a18f96a) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 60.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3417      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.59%   78.54%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         181      181              
  Lines       12546    12581      +35     
==========================================
+ Hits         9861     9882      +21     
- Misses       2252     2265      +13     
- Partials      433      434       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
modules/core/04-channel/types/query.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
modules/core/keeper/grpc_query.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
modules/core/04-channel/keeper/grpc_query.go	84.55% <77.77%> (-0.49%)	⬇️

[crodriguezvega]

Thank you, @expertdicer. There are a few places where receive is used instead of send.

[crodriguezvega]

Thanks, @expertdicer. I just realised there were a couple of other naming typos, but apart from that it looks good to me. I think we can ignore the lint warning receiver name k should be consistent with previous receiver name q for Keeper, since all the other receiver names will be renamed in a different PR.

[expertdicer]

Thanks, @expertdicer. I just realised there were a couple of other naming typos, but apart from that it looks good to me. I think we can ignore the lint warning receiver name k should be consistent with previous receiver name q for Keeper, since all the other receiver names will be renamed in a different PR.

I fixed the typos but I think there are typos in QueryNextSequenceReceive too. Should I fix it too ?

[damiannolan]

Nice! Thanks for the PR @expertdicer, very clean!

[crodriguezvega]

I fixed the typos but I think there are typos in QueryNextSequenceReceive too. Should I fix it too ?

No, no need to fix those in this PR. :) We can do that in a follow-up.

[crodriguezvega]

@expertdicer Just one more thing :) Could you run make format? Looks like on file needs to be gofumpted...

[DimitrisJim]

lgtm!