-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 716
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore!: migrate escrow accounts #2993
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please rebase on main and add label to backport to v15.1.x. Also, see my comments below.
bf5bed2
to
d064275
Compare
* Add UT for escrow accounts migration * Add changelog entry * Address comments and fix test issue
d064275
to
5ad7047
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Found no issues.
LGTM!
// to be represented using an 64-bit integer. Therefore, it's added to the | ||
// escrow updates list under the condition that the amount is successfully | ||
// converted to the sdk.Int type. | ||
if amt, ok := sdk.NewIntFromString("4388000000000000000000"); !ok { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately there isn't a sdk.MustNewIntFromString
function so this will do.
* Add UT for escrow accounts migration * Add changelog entry * Address comments and fix test issue (cherry picked from commit d8d90cc)
* Add UT for escrow accounts migration * Add changelog entry * Address comments and fix test issue (cherry picked from commit d8d90cc) Co-authored-by: Simon Noetzlin <[email protected]>
Description
Closes: #2989
cc @jtieri
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if API, client, or state breaking change (i.e., requires minor or major version bump).changelog
(for details, see contributing guidelines)Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking change