Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add low-level dependency injection container API #9658
feat: add low-level dependency injection container API #9658
Changes from 16 commits
8c8d996
02dcfae
d73f9df
32c8ce4
b873faf
a26539d
bf08a30
9c65775
d7773fa
211c756
aebc9aa
9ec37b6
392fb3f
125a275
887aca5
5f786f0
d553263
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought it was simpler to have one struct vs
dig.In
anddig.Out
... Wonder if anyone has an opinionThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In / Out makes it more clear when reading a structure definition, without going into the provider / usage:
dig.In
I quickly associate it with a dependencies of some type.dig.Out
I see that those are some dependencies a provider can provide.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm happy to change it to In/Out, but note that I also have structs named Input and Output here to describe the actual constructor inputs/outputs... Any suggestions on naming?