rosetta: upgrade to newest version

[noandrea]

Description

Embed the Rosetta SDK integration within the SDK

closes: #9300

---

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

• Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
• Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
• Code follows the module structure standards.
• Wrote unit and integration tests
• Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
• Added relevant godoc comments.
• Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
• Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
• Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

[lgtm-com]

This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging d494756 into b4125d1 - view on LGTM.com

new alerts:

• 1 for Useless assignment to field

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #9314 (18130fa) into master (8997074) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 74.24%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9314      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   60.37%   60.39%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         585      587       +2     
  Lines       36851    36914      +63     
==========================================
+ Hits        22247    22294      +47     
- Misses      12630    12645      +15     
- Partials     1974     1975       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
server/rosetta.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
server/rosetta/client_offline.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
server/rosetta/client_online.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
server/rosetta/config.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
server/rosetta/util.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/authz/simulation/operations.go	77.64% <ø> (ø)
x/feegrant/filtered_fee.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
server/rosetta/converter.go	55.95% <66.66%> (ø)
server/rosetta/lib/errors/errors.go	66.66% <66.66%> (ø)
server/rosetta/lib/errors/registry.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 2 more

[lgtm-com]

This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging 3dd84f0 into b4125d1 - view on LGTM.com

new alerts:

• 1 for Useless assignment to field

[lgtm-com]

This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging ab2298f2588680bfa5f854ec7225ba5dae7423f8 into eb7d939 - view on LGTM.com

new alerts:

• 1 for Useless assignment to field

[fedekunze]

utACK

[lgtm-com]

This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging ef0d7cdd20d5fd3e94a6793003241944a76adbf4 into eb7d939 - view on LGTM.com

new alerts:

• 1 for Useless assignment to field

[lgtm-com]

This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging 2ec06d2aac2c24a6336771b1597eccb54393e933 into eb7d939 - view on LGTM.com

new alerts:

• 1 for Useless assignment to field

[tac0turtle]

Thanks for the PR, before we can go ahead and merge this could you touch on whom the maintenance of this code will fall?

[robert-zaremba]

Looks good. This is not covered by simulation tests we are doing and only changing the rosetta server (except few autoformatting). So if you are going to handle it on top of the latest beta, then we can probably merge it in 0.43. @aaronc - what do you think?

[aaronc]

Looks good. This is not covered by simulation tests we are doing and only changing the rosetta server (except few autoformatting). So if you are going to handle it on top of the latest beta, then we can probably merge it in 0.43. @aaronc - what do you think?

I think that's fine. Merge when ready.