Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: update server/v2 api contract #22815

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

docs: update server/v2 api contract #22815

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt commented Dec 10, 2024

Description

Follow-up of #22811
Updates the docs in accordance to this: #22811 (comment)


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated terminology in comments from "server module" to "server component" for clarity.
    • Enhanced comments for methods in the ServerComponent interface to improve understanding of functionality.
    • Revised descriptions in the CLIConfig struct to reflect consistent terminology.

These changes aim to improve the clarity of the codebase without impacting functionality.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt requested review from hieuvubk, kocubinski and a team as code owners December 10, 2024 14:22
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to comments and documentation in the runtime/v2/config.go and server/v2/server.go files. The term "server module" has been replaced with "server component" to enhance clarity and consistency. Additionally, comments for various interfaces and structures have been added or modified to provide clearer descriptions of their functionality. These changes are purely cosmetic and do not affect the underlying logic or functionality of the code.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
runtime/v2/config.go Updated comment in ProvideModuleConfigMaps to replace "server module" with "server component."
server/v2/server.go Modified comments for interfaces and structs to replace "server module" with "server component." Added explicit comments for ServerComponent methods and updated CLIConfig struct comments.

Possibly related PRs

  • docs: update package list #22063: The changes in this PR update the documentation for the runtime/v2 package, which is directly related to the modifications made in the runtime/v2/config.go file in the main PR, as both involve clarifications in terminology regarding "server module" to "server component."
  • ci: run runtime/v2 tests in CI #22769: This PR adds a CI job to run tests specifically for the runtime/v2 module, which includes the runtime/v2/config.go file modified in the main PR, ensuring that any changes in that file are tested in the CI environment.

Suggested labels

C:x/upgrade, backport/v0.52.x

Suggested reviewers

  • akhilkumarpilli
  • tac0turtle
  • sontrinh16

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e07fee5 and 5b6719a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • runtime/v2/config.go (1 hunks)
  • server/v2/server.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • runtime/v2/config.go
  • server/v2/server.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2 label Dec 10, 2024
@julienrbrt julienrbrt enabled auto-merge December 10, 2024 23:45
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit c08ab17 Dec 11, 2024
76 of 77 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the julien/docs-sv branch December 11, 2024 07:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants